Sunday, December 27, 2020

Sam Shamoun about the prophet Muhammad "A WHITE RACIST OWNER OF BLACK SLAVES"



The Quran actually addresses the issue of racism since the account of creation. There it condemns Iblis who had no better reason to reject bowing to Adam, other than he was of lesser, earthly origins while he, Iblis, was made of fire.

The fact that man could be favored spiritually despite his humble origins could not be reconciled with Iblis' pride and arrogance just as the disbelievers of all times could not reconcile their prejudiced worldly views with God's criteria for prophethood that are not bound by any ethnical, social or economic considerations. The angels on the other hand bowed down before man, despite the fact that they were purely celestial beings, demonstrating that honor lies in obedience and humility to God.

The prophet David summed up this higher reality in the Bible
Ps8:6"You have made him (man) slightly less than the angels, and You have crowned him with glory and majesty". 
Man is of a lesser make than the angels but can achieve a much higher rank through spiritual merit. This also leads us to the Islamic concept that the worth of the human is not measured by his race, gender, ethnicity, tribal origins, or social achievements but through righteousness and spiritual awareness 4:1,25:77,34:37,25:27-8,42:23,49:13.

The promotion of racism, nationalism, tribalism and sectarianism at the expense of morality and human brotherhood is in actuality, following the lead of Satan and, by implication, rejecting the dignity of one's own self. The prophet said
"O people, your Lord is one and your father Adam is one. There is no favor of an Arab over a foreigner, nor a foreigner over an Arab, and neither white skin over black skin, nor black skin over white skin, except by righteousness. Have I not delivered the message?"
Or
"Verily, you have no virtue over one with white skin or black skin, except by favor of righteousness". 
Once the prophet was approached by a Bedouin who in a typical fashion and mentality of his time, asked him which tribe is best. The prophet, in accordance with the aforementioned Quran teachings repeated the principle that
"The most noble is the one who has the most piety.”
The man said he didnt mean it in that sense. So the Prophet gave him a satisfactory answer all the while keeping in view the Quran principle of the true value of a human being
"the most noble person is Yusuf ibn Ya‘qub ibn Ishaaq ibn Ibrahim".
He gave him the example of a non-Arab whose righteousness exceeded that of most Arabs. That is besides all extra Quranic material speaking of some black people among the prophet's closest entourage, such as the ex-slave Bilal or the prophet's second wife Sawda. Bilal was the first caller to prayer, praised as one who is already in heaven despite still alive. He was selected among those who entered the Kaaba together with the prophet upon the conquest of Mecca for the first time. Elsewhere in the ahadith the prophet is depicted as supporting a black woman's testimony in a dispute with an Arab man, praying at the grave of a black man, forbidding a man from disowning his dark complexioned son, reprimanding a companion for mocking the skin color of a black man. The prophet did so by pointing him to the principle that no human is of any value except in his God-consciousness 49:13. 

This verse in addition states the racial and tribal varieties among humans should not be factors of separation, people instead should actively seek to know one another precisely because of these differences
"We have created you of a male and a female, and made you tribes and families that you may know each other; surely the most honorable of you with Allah is the one among you most careful (of his duty); surely Allah is Knowing, Aware"
Diversity in creation is seen as a manifestation of God's mercy and creativity, a positive aspect of nature, including in the variety of skin color
30:20-22"One of His signs is that He created you from dust and- lo and behold!- you became human and scattered far and wide. Another of His signs is that He created spouses from among yourselves for you to live with in tranquillity: He ordained love and kindness between you. There truly are signs in this for those who reflect. Another of His signs is the creation of the heavens and earth, and the diversity of your languages and colours. There truly are signs in this for those who know"  
35:27-28"Have you [Prophet] not considered how God sends water down from the sky and that We produce with it fruits of varied colours; that there are in the mountains layers of white and red of various hues, and jet black; that there are various colours among human beings, wild animals, and livestock too? It is those of His servants who have knowledge who stand in true awe of God. God is almighty, most forgiving".
The prophet commented that
"Allah created Adam from a handful which he took from the whole of the earth ; so the children of Adam are in accordance with the earth : some red, some white, some black, some a mixture, also smooth and rough, bad and good". 
There is good and bad in all of humanity, not in one race particularly.

There is therefore no hint to racial prejudice anywhere in the Quran and the prophetic sayings.

We find negative allusions to darkness in the hereafter, but not in the racial sense. The unrepentant sinners on the day of judgement will be wandering in the same darkness that they were walking in this life. Consequently they are depicted as asking a share of the light beaming on the righteous
57:13-15"Wait for us so that we may acquire light from your light. It will be said (to them): Go back behind you and seek a light. And a wall would be struck between them with a door, its interior containing mercy, but on its outside, there will be torture". 
Their whole beings will be thus plunged into darkness, as if literally
10:27"covered with slices of the dense darkness of night". 
Some ahadith refer to them coming out of Adam's left shoulder
"black offsrpings as if they were charcoal" 
describing their state following their judgement and decree to enter the Fire
"To hell, and I do not care". 
The hadith, unsurprisingly graded weak by Shuayb al-Arnaaut, cannot be alluding to the origin of the human race. It speaks of multitudes coming out of Adam's shoulder and entering hellfire. 

The absence of light upon the wicked on the day of judgement is alluded to in the Hebrew Bible, including in Job38:14-15. A thick and burning smoke will then drive them inside of hell 44:10-11,77:30-4. 

Their faces, blackened by the scorching hellfire 3:106,39:60 will in addition be covered with ignominy, symbolized by dirt and dust from the ground 10:26,80:40. 

The idea of darkening the faces in the hereafter will both be in the physical and metaphorical sense. Of course, this idea has no racial connotation, as it speaks of the darkening of the faces only, not the entire body. Just as the radiant faces of the righteous, beaming from the divine light shining on them 3:106,75:22,80:38,83:24 has nothing to do with racial whiteness. A black face is in Arabic an idiom for shame, grief, distress as in 43:17, when a man’s face blackens upon hearing news of an infant girl. While a white face denotes emotional, spiritual joy and relief. 

There is pre-Islamic poetry in which "black faces" implies dishonoring. 

In a known incident involving Jewish adulterers in Medina, while seeking the prophet's judgement, they said that they had substituted the biblical punishment of stoning with blackening of the face to symbolize dishonoring. The prophet is reported to have invoked Allah's curse upon the disbelievers at the battle of Badr by blowing dust from the ground upon their faces, at a distance. 

Even in our modern Arabic, we speak of blackening/whitening one's face to imply honoring or dishonoring. It is similar to the idea in Western culture of "losing one's face". 

Some hadith describe situations where the prophet is confronting his racially prejudiced society, telling them that whoever a leader might be, even an
"Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin",
then they are to put their prejudice aside and obey him. Raisin is in reference to the black color. The prophet is using their own prejudice against them, pushing it to the extreme to explain there are no boundaries of race in legitimate leadership. He was always quick to correct his people's racial and societal prejudices 
"A black person, a male or a female used to clean the Mosque and then died. The Prophet did not know about it . One day the Prophet remembered him and said, "What happened to that person?" The people replied, "O Allah's Messenger! He died." He said, "Why did you not inform me?" They said, "His story was so and so (i.e. regarded him as insignificant)." He said, "Show me his grave." He then went to his grave and offered the funeral prayer". 
He respectfully stood at the funeral procession of a Jew, in a time of great enmity between Medinite Jews and Muslims, demonstrating the principle that we are all equal in humanity 
"A funeral procession passed in front of the Prophet and he stood up. When he was told that it was the coffin of a Jew, he said, "Is it not a living being (soul)?"
Mahran, his black slave was a vehicle of impressive miracle of strength. As they were returning together from a tiresome trip, most probably a battle, in which he did not participate since slaves were exempted, the prophet who on the other hand did participate, progressively loaded Mahran with more and more heavy belongings of the travellers until, in his own words
"i carried the load of six or seven donkeys without even feeling it".
The last part of the quote is often omitted by polemicists. Following the incident, Mahran was nicknamed "the ship". The prophet knew what he was doing and how a miracle would ensue. He was not deliberately loading Mahran with more than what he would be able to bear
"Your slaves are your brethren, upon whom God has given you authority. So, if one has one’s brethren under one’s control, one should feed them with the like of what one eats and clothe them with the like of what one wears. You should not ask them to do things beyond their capacity, and if you do so, help them [with their hard job]". 
The prophet would even tolerate black ethnic groups among the population of slaves, to play their instruments and display their cultural dances at occasions (that particular report is often distorted by polemicists arguing they were instead displayed for sale).

Other similar shameless distortions by those who believe in vain things and whose religion tolerates any means possible so long as "Christ is preached", are a quote from Tabari saying blacks were created to be the Arabs' servants. The quote is not attributed to the prophet. 

Then there is a Bukhari hadith where an indebted man pledges to free/manumit his only valuable possession which he could have used to settle his debt instead. The prophet used to personally settle the debts of those who had no assets. But it wasnt this indebted man's case, which is why the prophet cancelled that pledge and settled the debt by transfer of ownership of the slave. It would have been unfair for the prophet to use his limited assets to settle this particular debt when other indebted people were more entitled to his gracious and compassionate help. 

Finally, only those whose history and religion is burdened with a dark notion of "slavery" think that a slave in Islam lives in misery as was the case with them. 

When some ahadith depict the prophet as white, it isn't Caucasian white but in the middle eastern understanding, even nowadays when an Arab is said to be "blond" it means light skinned from the Arabic skin tone. When the Arabs called the Romans Bani Asfar/yellow, it wasnt in reference to blond hair but the skin tone which they believed was due to their forefather Rum ibn Al-Ais Ibn Ishaq. Others thought their land was conquered partly by the Abyssinians of Africa with whom they intermarried, resulting in offspring with a yellowish skintone. 

Many ahadith describe the prophet's skin color. Elsewhere it is said
‘he had a rosy color, neither absolutely white nor deep brown’. 
The statement from Qadi Iyad
"whoever says that the Prophet was black is killed. The Prophet was not black" 
occurs 400 years after the Prophet and uttered in a specific context, which is as usual ignored by the polemicists who think they can freely interject in a discussion occurring centuries earlier. Ahmad ibn Sulayman was a member of the family that ruled a part of what is now Spain. He was in Europe and surrounding countries were those of Europeans. 

The enemies of Islam, in those days werent different than the shameless ones of today, they have always insulted the Messenger of God and this was another one in their racist view. Secondly, to call the Prophet black would be to deny his lineage; it is to say that his mother wasn’t really his mother. Coming from the venomous Western tongue which for most of its bible loving history viewed blacks as subhumans, such a statement was an insult. Saying to anyone, especially in a derogatory tone, that he is from another race than what he and his culture proudly trace themselves to, is an insult. Try saying to a Greek that he is of Turkish descent or to an Irish that he's English. 

Further, within the same statement there is a long list of acts in relation to the prophet which the rulers of the time decided to punish, such as if someone says that the prophet died before his beard began to grow, then he is to be killed. There is nothing wrong with the sta
tement in and of itself but when one makes these statements with the aim to defame and insult, then its not something any Muslim would tolerate. 

The Prophet did not own only black slaves. Slavery, the Islamic understanding of the term not the Judeo-christian western one, was common in those days and slaves came in all colours and races. 

If he compared Satan to a specific contemporaneous black man (Nabtal), who not only had ugly monstrous looks but also evil and sinful behavior, it isnt necessarily for the color of his skin. Only a polemicists whose self and society diabolizes black people for the color of their skin may think so. The prophet, let alone the Quran as depicted in introduction, was far from such lowly morality and prejudice. In another similar narration he compares Satan to an Arab. Further there are statements of the Prophet where he compared the end times arch-evil figure (dajjal) to Abdul Uzza b. Qatan who was an Arab and not black. 

Finally and contrary to certain other polemics, the prophet did not "trade" in slavery. 

Under the hudaybiya treaty, any Muslim from Mecca fleeing to Medina where the Muslim community was established, had to be returned to the Meccans. It was in such circumstances that a person whom the prophet did not know was someone's slave, sought refuge with him. When the Meccan master came looking for him, he would not return until the prophet gave him 2 of his own, and of his, the Meccan's, choice. The 2 chosen by the Meccan were black. He chose the best in his sight and although the bargain was not ideal for the prophet, he showed that he valued his own much more than his opponents valued theirs. 

A report from Zad al Maad by ibn Qayyim, speaking of the prophet buying and selling slaves, gives a single example of such "transaction" which is none other than the one already spoken of by Bukhari above. As to the prophet buying slaves this is of course attested many times in the authentic reports, he bought them from other Muslims following their capture as war prisoners, to immediately emancipate them and set the example. The report from Zad al Maad gives other details which are dismissed by the hadith scholars, including Bukhari as inauthentic. This is mentioned in the footnotes of ibn Qayyim's complete version of Zad al maad p163-165.

Saturday, December 26, 2020

Mary, the sister of Aaron?


There are no records in scriptures of the past as to who Mary's parents were. This in itself is enough to discard all these conspiracists' theories to the dustbin of baseless conjectures. But let us still delve into that issue further and leave them no chance at exploiting this ambiguity to serve their malicious objectives.

The Quran says Mary's mother was married to a man named Imran 3:35. This is where the conspirasists jump for joy and begin their tirades. The Quran they say, makes an anachronistic error because it names Mary's father Imran, who also happens to be the father of another Mary that lived centuries prior in the Bible.

As if people within a tribe dont share the same names, or that for example Zechariah is the only prophet to hold that name or that Joseph who is believed by Christians to be Mary's husband was the first man ever among Israel to bear that name? Or was Mary actually married to the Joseph who ruled Egypt? There are many instances within the Bible to corroborate for example Jethro's 7 different names are shared by other people too, some of them were his contemporaries and others came after him. Same thing with Elihu ben Barachel, whose name many people share over different generations for example the prophet Samuel's great-grandfather 1Sam1:1, a brother of the prophet King David 1Chron27:18, a chief of the Manasheh tribe 1Chron12:20 and a descendant of Korah 1Chron26:7.  

It is however interesting to note that in extra Biblical tradition, Mary's father is named Joachim. Etymologically, Imran and Joachim share a similar origin. Joachim is "the one whom Yahweh set up" while Imran may stem from aamr/to build up, rise up.

In her pregnancy, Imran's pious wife vowed to offer what was in her womb to the devotion of God 3:35 as denoted with "muharraran" to mean that the child is free of any other obligation or attachment. She desired a male whom she wanted to follow in the footsteps of the priestly family, living in devotion to God and serving Him in the Temple. This religious function was prescribed exclusively for the male descendants of the Levites branch. It was Harun/Aaron who is said to have initiated that function for the Israelites Ex28:1,29,40:13,Lev8,1:3,Num3:10,18:4-7 and renewed again by Phinehas Numbers25:13.

But when she brought forth a female whom she thought wouldnt be able to live up to her spiritual expectations and duties in the Temple, she was explained that her excellence would go far beyond any hopes she had entertained

3:36"God had been fully aware of what she would give birth to, and [fully aware] that no male child [she might have hoped for] could ever have been like this female".
She named her Maryam and invoked Allah's protection on her and her offspring 3:36.

In the ahadith we read that in answer to her mother's prayers, the divine protection and supervision of Mary extended to her son Jesus, to the point Allah prevented in her case a seemingly harmless event of the unseen, that every newborn experiences at birth 
"No child is born but that, Satan touches it when it is born whereupon it starts crying loudly because of being touched by Satan, except Mary and her son".
The hadith does not speak of sin, nor of sinful nature, rather conveys the idea that Allah will protect them both from the assaults of evil entities, from birth till they return to Him.

Maryam was orphaned early on which is why she was given at a young age to one of God's prophets, Zakariyya, for care 3:37,44.

God received Mary's mother's prayers and manifested them in the best way; under Zakariya's close guardianship, she was taken care of to develop physically and spiritually. The Arabic in 3:37 uses a beautiful imagery saying literally

"her nurturing Lord accepted her with beautiful reception, and made her planted a good planting, and He made Zachariah to take care of her".
Mary remained in total devotion to God, mostly practicing worship in seclusion in her own private area of prayers, almihrab. The root H-R-B means war or distancing and separation. It also means the person’s money or the most important place in the house. Here the word implies the most important part of the house and the place of prayer is included within that meaning. As a side note, Zakariyya was Jesus' uncle through marriage with Elizabeth, who is Mary's relative, and who is a prophet according to the NT in Lk1:67-79.

A priest's daughter or "Bat-Kohen" is considered unique compared to the other Israelite daughters. That uniqueness is due to her scrupulous modesty, thereby portraying the values of maintaining a life dedicated to holiness, as well as her inherent ability to cope with above than average, and even intense levels of spirituality due to her upbringing by a Kohen/priest, whose life is dedicated to God's service.

Since Mary belonged to the priestly caste, whose founder was the renowned Harun, she was associated to him with the metaphorical phrase "sister of Harun" by the slanderers who saw her with an newborn 19:27-28. This was to stress the shamefulness of her act in relation to the illustruous names in her family, most relevant to her status as a priest's daughter. 

Now we get to the part most interesting to the misleading and misinformed critics of Islam. The Quran they say, made here an anachronistic error by mistaking Mary/Miriam Jesus' mother with Mary/Miriam Aaron's and Moses' sister spoken of in the Bible and who lived long before. Putting aside the fact that such critics, mainly from a Judeo-Christian background forget that such phraseologies have always been used by Israelites, including Jesus when he stated that, regardless of time and space
Mk3:35"Whoever does God's will is my brother and sister and mother".
What these critics need to consider is that, had this been true, had the Quran truly mixed up the 2 Marys, why does the verse not depict these Jewish slanderers as resorting to the weigthiest of all arguments by singling out her other alleged brother, Moses? He is mentionned in the same sentence together with Aaron, as Miriam's brother in the text from whence the Quran's author supposedly copied from Num26:59.

This passage speaks in one breath of Mary, Aaron and Moses as siblings. Even if this mysterious Quran author did not have access to the text itself, why would anyone transmitting the text orally specifically omit Moses' name? Or if that oral transmitter did not omit Moses' name, why would the mysterious Quran author want to remove it from the Quran?

Moses, in addition, in contrast to Aaron, is the sole prophet who, according to the Jewish tenets of faith up to this day, they must recognize as the greatest of all. Jewish tradition and scriptures repeatedly describe him as having superior authority, prestige and prophetic experience as echoed even in the Quran. Yet here is the Quran depicting those very Jews as pointing to Harun instead, a mere support and assistant of Moses, who lacked authority among his people to the point they rebelled against him in Moses' absence, returned to idol worship, with their scriptures even painting Aaron as among those that facilitated the transgression?

The mentionning of Harun instead of the greater names in Mary's alleged contemporary family such as Moses, demonstrates it cannot be speaking of her literal, physical sisterhood but rather to her metaphorical descendency, as established in the usage of the word in Semitic languages. That metaphorical descendancy refers to a specific branch whose founder was Harun, and who had established a cast inside which a woman, a bat-kohen, was supposed to represent the highest standards of chastity and piety through her spiritual devotion and impeccable upbringing by a priest. 

There is a liturgical text the Christians of Jerusalem used to read around the 7th century, called the Lection of Jeremiah. In it, Aaron is called the "brother of Mary". This further corroborates the metaphorical usage of brotherhood and sisterhood in religious terminology, knowingly and without anachronism, even when the persons are non-contemporaries whose direct family members hold the same names. Any other conclusion would imply that Christians of the Levant were confused on Mary's genealogy just as the Quran supposedly is.


Another objection cited on the subject is that the Quran should have said "daughter of Harun" as is usally done when speaking of the descendant of an illustruous character. This however is nonsensical in that context since the verse also speaks in one breath of her biological parents who have passed away. Had the Quran used "daughter of Harun" instead it would have confused the sentence and implied that Harun was her biological FATHER "O DAUGHTER of Harun! Your FATHER was not an evil human, nor was your mother unchaste". That argument not only is nonsensical syntactically but also shoots down the critics' own argument since it invalidates their claim that the Quran confounded Mary/Miriam (Jesus' mother) with the Miriam who was Aaron's biological SISTER and lived long before.

Similarly, if it meant biological sisterhood it would have used the plural possessive when speaking of the father (abukum) and mother (umukum). It however uses the feminine singular possessive (abuki/umuki), pointing to the parents in the verse as being only those of Mary, not of Aaron of whom she is the metaphorical sister.

Furthermore if, according to Christian theology, Mary was not a Levite but from the house of Judah then referencing her as "daughter of Aaron" would imply direct descendancy from him. Sisterhood on the other hand has a different connotation. And even if one accepts Mary's Levitical lineage, which is more in line with NT genealogies, then calling her the "daughter of Aaron" would still be excluded for the aforementionned reasons.  

A holistic reading of the Islamic texts, whether it is the Quran, the traditions or the commentaries, all show that Mary and Jesus are from a different time period than Moses. The Quranic narrative implies that many generations of messengers succeeding eachother seperates them 2:87,3:50,5:43-46,etc.

Further, in the Quranic accounts surrounding Moses, Aaron, Jesus and Mary, the circumstances and locations are entirely different for the first 2 and the last 2, and the characters of both groups are never mixed in the same space and time nor do they interract, while they do interract among characters of the same group. For instance, Jesus and Mary are many times interracting, as is the case with Moses and Aaron yet we never see Jesus interracting with Moses or Aaron with Mary. Nor are Jesus and Mary ever seen in the same context and background as Moses and Aaron, and vice versa. 

Also, the Quran repeatedly speaks of Moses' sister, during the account of his infancy, without ever naming her Mary 20:40. Besides the contexts and timeframes clearly separating between Moses and Jesus, how could this already grown up "Mary" during Moses' infancy, be the same young Mary to give birth to Jesus many years later?

The converging factors are many, on a macro or micro-level, indicating that the Quran was accurate, correct and aware of the correct relationship between these various characters, and that the phrase "sister of Harun" was knowingly used.

More importantly, contrary to Miriam the sister of Aaron and Moses in the Bible from where critics claim the Quran copied from, Mary the mother of Jesus was orphanned very early on per the Quran meaning that her relatives spoken of during her early years and beyond are those of people who have passed away. In 19:28, the slanderers appeal to her parents' righteousness in the past tense, because they have passed away at the time. Because of this, she had to be put under someone elses' guardianship namely the prophet Zakariya. Mary was orphaned so young and abruptly, and her importance to the eyes of the elders of the comunity so great, that her entourage, after casting lots to decide who would be her guardian, still objected and contended with one another as to who would be honoured with caring for her 3:44.

Such measures would've been useless had her close relatives, such as her alleged brothers Moses and Harun been alive in her early years. Biblical and Judeo-Christian tradition plainly state her brothers outlived her by many years. Had the Quran's author been sourcing his information from those older materials, he would have never overlooked that information.

Sam Shamoun "Sujood – The Act of Worship Which Allah Shares With His Creatures"


The angel's prostration was a demonstration of their entire submission to the Almighty, first and foremost. It further humbled them in relation to Adam. In this is a lesson concerning the major test man will face in this world, the instinct of self pride that should be tamed by remembering the example of the angels: in spite of being an older creation, higher in rank and make, and closer than any other entity to God, they prostrated before Adam in compliance with the directive of the Almighty. 

Adam in a sense was the first ever qibla, just like the Kaaba is now the final qibla to which every Muslim has to prostrate to. Prostration to that building is out of obedience to a divine command, just as prostration to Adam was to be done out of obedience to God 
2:143"And it was only to distinguish between those that follow the messenger and those who turn about on their heels that We have appointed the qibla which you observed". 
Neither Adam nor the Kaaba are divine because they were or are prostrated to.

This verse also allows prostration from one created entity to another, if it is purely out of reverence. Sajda carries the meanings of putting one's forehead on the ground as well as metaphorically submitting, obeying and hence its use in the Quran for both animate and inanimate entities to denote their obedience to the divine will 2:58,22:18,55:6 an obedience we cannot always understand 17:44. The prophet Yusuf's entire family fell in prostration before him, without being rebuked 12:100. The HB is replete with instances of humans bowing down to other humans as a sign of humility, not worship. However, the sajda of worship is for the Creator only 13:14-5,41:37. The prophet explained this reality on several occasions to his followers. Some companions once interpreted a camel's bowing in front of the prophet as a sajda of worship. They asked the prophet's permission to do the same which he refused
 "Worship/aabudu your Lord and honour your brother. If I were to order anyone to prostrate himself before another, I should order a woman to prostrate herself before her husband". 
The prophet here does not declare the act of prostration between humans in general as forbidden, because the Quran allows it. He forbade it to himself specifically because he wanted to prevent an inclination among his followers to over exalt him. That is why he began explaining that reverence between humans must be divested from any tinge of worship. Worship is only due to God. And if, as a sign of reverence, prostration were done it would not be to himself but by a wife to her husband. The prophet redirects the idea of prostration to other than him as he saw that even honouring him in such a way carried a risk for his followers. Despite several precedents among the prophets, let alone kings, notables or religious leaders within his own lifetime, as well as the willingness of his own followers, the prophet Muhammad, instead of seizing upon this opportunity offered to him to increase in eminence, chooses humility for the interest of his people.


Further reading answering Sam Shamoun "Sujood – The Act of Worship Which Allah Shares With His Creatures"

The marital advantages of the prophet?

4:3,33:50-1"specially for you, not for the (rest of) believers; We know what We have ordained for them concerning their wives and those whom their right hands possess in order that no blame may attach to you; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful". 
Here, the women made lawful to him are spelled out, outside of which he could not marry, and each with a specific purpose that he might discharge his duties of prophethood and moral reformer without any hindrance, blame and difficulty:
1. Those whom he was already married to
2. Those whom were captured in war, meaning for the pacification of tribes
3. Cousins from paternal and maternal sides that had migrated with him and left everything behind, meaning close family ties should not impede him from coming to such women's help.
4. Women that wanted to gift their souls to the Prophet, if he so desired to marry them. These women knew the difficulties that awaited them, spiritually due to their religious burdens and social role, emotionally due to the prophet hardly being available for them. In addition they knew they could not re-marry following his death, besides the major fact that financially, the prophet's household lived a very basic lifestyle relatively to others in the comunity. These selective criteria allowed for only the most pious, disinterested elements to be associated to him. 
Here, the women made lawful to him are spelled out, outside of which he could not marry, and each with a specific purpose that he might discharge his duties of prophethood and moral reformer without any hindrance, blame and difficulty:
1. Those whom he was already married to
2. Those whom were captured in war, meaning for the pacification of tribes
3. Cousins from paternal and maternal sides that had migrated with him and left everything behind, meaning close family ties should not impede him from coming to such women's help.
4. Women that wanted to gift their souls to the Prophet, if he so desired to marry them. These women knew the difficulties that awaited them, spiritually due to their religious burdens and social role, emotionally due to the prophet hardly being available for them. In addition they knew they could not re-marry following his death, besides the major fact that financially, the prophet's household lived a very basic lifestyle relatively to others in the community. These selective criteria allowed for only the most pious, disinterested elements to be associated to him. This ordinance was so revealing of their piety that Aisha used to say 
"I used to feel jealous of those women who offered themselves to the Prophet and I said, `Would a woman offer herself'"
And yet the noble prophet never took advantage of that rule as reported from ibn Abbas 
"The Messenger of Allah did not have any wife who offered herself to him". 
Ibn Kathir relates on such situations involving Khawlah bint Hakim
 "a woman came to the Messenger of Allah and said, "O Messenger of Allah, verily, I offer myself to you (for marriage).'' She stood there for a long time, then a man stood up and said, "O Messenger of Allah, marry her to me if you do not want to marry her.'' The Messenger of Allah said: (Do you have anything that you could give to her as a dowery) He said, "I have only this garment of mine.'' The Messenger of Allah said: (If you give her your garment, you will be left with no garment. Look for something.) He said, "I do not have anything.'' He said: Look for something, even if it is only an iron ring.) So he looked, but he could not find anything. Then the Messenger of Allah said to him: (Do you have (know) anything of the Qur'an) He said, "Yes, Surah such and such and Surah and such,'' he named the Surahs. So, the Messenger of Allah said: (I marry her to you with what you know of the Qur'an.)"
The verse made it clear that the prophet's marriages were primarily motivated by his religious, social and moral obligations, and no blame was attached to him ever by his contemporaries for him marrying more than 4 in order to fulfill these duties, from within the categories allowed to him and with the special procedures cited in the verses. This shows that his contemporaries, enemies an followers alike, were aware and could not deny his motivation for having more wives than other Muslims.

The prophet's wives had the title of mothers of the believers 
33:6"The Prophet is closer to the Believers than their own selves, and his wives are their mothers". 
That sanctified title carried several implications to those that were willing to uphold it. It is not a title of nobility but rather denotes responsibility and care towards the community. For example Zaynab one of the prophet's wives was called Barrah/pious. The prophet told her to keep her name instead of that nickname to avoid her "giving herself the prestige of piety". He further told his wives 
"Don't hold yourself to be pious. It is God alone who knows the people of piety among you".
They had to restrain their social activities to their own houses as much as possible in order to dedicate themselves to piety and religious study, pray intensely, solidify in their memories the recitations and wisdom of the revelation so that they become means of preserving the right way 33:33-4. During their spiritual counseling activities, they had to watch for the tone of their voice when addressing the opposite sex so that they leave no ambiguity as to their intentions, or cause those with an indecent inclination to harbor inapropriate thoughts. They had to speak to males outside their close relatives from behind a curtain 33:32,53-55. 

This injunction, besides it being a logical demand of modesty whenever opposite sexes interract, becomes all the more relevant if one considers the Quran's description in sura ahzab/33 of the atmosphere of rumour mongering, provocations and other verbal abuses the prophet, and the righteous members of the Muslim community at large were either already the targets of, or were potentially at risk of. There were elements within the community and outside of it that were on the look out for any opportunity to spew their malice and discredit and dishearten the Muslims. Consequently the prophet's household and the Muslims at large are given reassurance of the nobility of their status in God's eyes, and told in wich manners to fend off those with evil inclinations. The best way to fend off these attacks were with ethics becoming of the nobility of their moral status as well as by adopting a modest dresscode. 

The religious duties the prophet's wives had to shoulder were such, that willingly faltering in that respect would make them deserving of a more severe chastisement in the hereafter 33:30. This was meant to stress their spiritual responsibilities and the fact they had to exemplify piety, and so their moral conduct should be corresponding. 

As stated in 33:32, their difference with other Muslim women consisted in them maintaining and propagating moral, ethical and spiritual uprightness. On the other hand their reward will be more intense than regular people due to their higher sacrifices 33:31. This is just like Allah's addressing the prophet warning him not to falter in his righteousness and upright conduct lest he should face a double/more severe punishement than regular people 10:15,17:73-4,39:65,68:9. There is a simple reason behind that principle, leaders in a society are the ones that establish moral standards and are emulated. Their evil does not remain their own but spreads fast and creates further evil, just as their goodness. One and the same sin may thus be requited according to different levels of severity depending on the person comitting it as well as the social repercussions of that sin. 

Finally, in consequence of their designation and duties as mothers of the believers, they were not allowed to remarry after the prophet's death, contrary to regular muslim women divorcees 33:53.
The difference between the prophet's wives and others is that obviously none would ever marry and sleep with Moses', Solomon's, Abraham's or Muhammad's wives had the prophets passed away. This sanctified status is not one that was decreed because some believers would potentially desire to unite with one of them after the prophet's demise, it was addressed to the wives he already had and those in the future that would enter into a marriage with him, making clear to them the conditions of marrying him, and the consequences. 

To those that were already married to him, they could at anytime prior to his death, relinquish that status and be given the opportunity to leave this life of sacrifices and socio-religious responsibilities. Some of them did, prior to even consuming the marriage, unable to bear the burden of responsibility and an austere life. In 33:28-29 they are told that if their desire for this world and its adornment is preferable in their eyes than a life of sacrifices dedicated to their spiritual duties 
"say to your wives: If you desire this world´s life and its adornment, then come, I will give you a provision and allow you to depart a goodly departing". 
After divorce the woman would have stood excluded from the category of "mothers of believers", and she would not be forbidden to any other Muslim; for she would have chosen divorce from the prophet only for the sake of the world and its adornments of which she had been given the choice. The prophet's wives had thus the option of requesting and getting a just and kind divorce for even such petty reasons like their desire to pursue this wordly life which God's prophet could not afford giving them in his household. No shame or stigma was put on those that did nor on those that would afterwards. Divorces with prophet occured. Also, enemies of Islam were all around Medina and within the city itself. Had there been such a potential negative consequence on a divorced woman's personal life she could have joined any opposing community just as former polytheist Meccan women joined the Medina Muslims for shelter after conversion to Islam. Furthermore, in relation to 33:28-9 referred to earlier, no muslim, and no man of any culture is required to go out of his way and ask his wife if she is happy and satisfied enough in all material aspects, especially when one is just with the wife in relation to one's financial capabilities. Further, no muslim or man in general is required to offer divorce if the wife is unhappy. On top of it, not simple divorce, with each partner going his/her way, which would be fairest in this case, but a "gracious" divorce, where the wife is free to leave as well as receive compensation if she chooses to. Yet this is what was required of the prophet, contrary to all muslims, a man supposedly seeking multiple marriages of lust.

By the time this verse was revealed, and as shown in the direct context, the Muslims had conquered the rich agricultural region of Khaybar, and the community had grown more prosperous. But while life was becoming easier for most of its members, this ease was not reflected in the household of the Prophet 33:28-9. As was always his habit, he only allowed himself and his family only the absolute minimum necessary for the most simple living 
28:83"that future abode, We assign it to those who have no desire to exalt themselves in the earth nor to make mischief and the good end is for those who guard (against evil)". 
His prestigious status as a prophet and ruler never came in the way of that humble principle of living. Not only was he not ever one to ask for any kind of reward from his addressees 6:90,12:104etc, his reward and compensation being simply that people might be guided 
25:57"Say: ‘No reward do I ask of you for this. All I ask is that he who so wills may find a way leading to his Lord" 
but every occasion where he could make use of his status and deep knowledge for material benefit, he would do it for the sake of the needy 
58:12"when you consult the Messenger, then offer something in charity before your consultation; that is better for you and purer". 
The prophet's wives on the other hand naturally were longing for a share in the comparative luxuries which other Muslim women could now enjoy. His wives often stated that they had little on their shelves besides bread flour and dates. But it is reported that all of them rejected a possible seperation with the prophet and resumed their spiritual duties as "mothers of the believers", and were promised a great reward in the Hereafter for having denied themselves the ordinary comforts of life by remaining in the Prophet's house 33:31. Their voluntary worldy sacrifices can only be understood from a spiritual perspective. Umm Habiba, one of the prophet's wives had such awareness for that spiritual favor despite the sacrifices that she even proposed the hand of her own sister to the prophet 
“Are you interested in my sister, Apostle of Allaah?” He said “What should I do?” She said “You marry her” He said “Your sister?” She said “Yes”. He said “Do you like that?” she said “I am not alone with you of those who share me in this good, my sister is most to my liking. He said “She is not lawful for me.”

Further related reading