Tuesday, November 17, 2020

Sam Shamoun "Another Passage Which Exposes Muhammad’s Fraud: The Samaritan Who Didn’t Exist" (1)



Moses had left his people hastily at the perspective of meeting the Almighty. He left them under the supervision of Aaron but warned his brother against their tendency to rebel, telling him to steadfastly maintain the position of truth in the face of potential opposition  7:142-3,20:83-4. As his 40 days of communion with God came to an end, he was told to go back to them to confront their rebellion Ex32:1,7-20,Quran2:51-2,7:148-156,20:85-97.

Upon seeing them, worshipping the idol, Moses was overtaken by anger and grief, threw down the tablets and, according to the Torah, broke them Ex32:19. In his rage, he grabbed his brother Aaron's head violently as if he was about to beat him, until Aaron pleaded with him and explained why he could not prevent them from rebelling 7:150,20:94.

God is described with the word "ghafur", stemming from Gh-F-R meaning covering something. That covering can be for the purpose of hiding, or protecting, as well as both. The implication is that God provides a covering upon the person to hide the sins of the past in case there were any 5:65 all the while providing a protection from the potential sins of the future, by increasing the person's spirituality. It is up to the believer to maintain that covering of protection throughout his life, elsewhere referred to as the garment of God-consciousness 7:26. If he loses it, he is again exposed to moral and spiritual failure. His past sins will remain hidden/forgiven but the future ones will have to be rectified 
14:10"He calls you to forgive for you OF your sins". 
This, as a side note, strikes at the notion of guaranteed salvation and forgiveness from sins -past and future- which is propounded by certain belief systems and more particularly Christianity.

The believers and prophets have always asked God to provide them with ghafr, the covering that hides and/or protects. It comes with merit as often repeated in the HB Ps23:1,85:3 but its implications far surpass in value the level of merit needed to obtain it. God only requires in exchange sincerity and resolve in walking aright. The correct mindframe, as exemplified with the prophets who constantly sought the ghafr from Allah, is to feel that one's righteous actions are defective, that they could always be improved since nobody can claim perfection of action besides God 47:19. As reported in the NT 
Mk10:18"“Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone". 
By seeking the ghafr from Allah, the believer shows his humility so that Allah might accept one's imperfect deeds done with sincerity and to please Him, and cover their inherent shortcomings.

Following Moses' prayer, those guilty were pointed out by God as deserving of severe punishment, showing that Aaron and Moses had no direct responsibility in the incident 7:152. 

The Torah blames the prophet Aaron whom Moses appointed over them during his absence Ex32, a prophet chosen by God per the Quran and the HB itself to assist Moses in his mission against Pharaoh and his oppressive tyrants, yet he supposedly does the exact opposite under the pressure of some Israelites. The Quran says the Israelites' own hidden love for idols that was ingrained in them during their captivity, was stirred and brought to light by a crafty and deceitful person whom it refers to as "the samiri", the true instigator of the incident. 

In addition to hardening Pharaoh's heart so that he rejects the divine signs and is consequently destroyed and the enslaved Israelites set free, YHWH commands Moses to tell the Israelites to deceive every Egyptian they could reach, into "lending" them their precious belongings like silver, gold objects, as well as expensive garments, so that they "do not go empty handed". YHWH assures Moses that the Egyptians will not only be influenced into accepting the Israelites' request, but that they will also be eager to give out more than demanded "and you shall empty out Egypt" Ex3:21-22,11:2,12:35-36.

The Quran mentions the presence of ornaments in the Israelites' possession during their exile but doesnt give any credence to the story. One might ask why would God issue such an unpractical command and burden them with all sorts of unnecessary load as they set themselves out for a long and difficult journey in the desert? It is hard not to see yet again, the hand of the scribes giving a divine warrant to their own sinful decisions and actions. An interesting thing to note is that in some rabbinical commentaries of the Hebrew Bible, some see in Prov10:8 which says "The wise-hearted takes commandments, but he who talks foolishly will weary" an implicit reference to the incident, with Moses being the "wise-hearted", busy with the commandements while the rest of the Israelites were plundering their masters.

In the Quran, it precisely is that burdensome nature of all these belongings, that were actually loots, that is stated to have been among the factors that led to the golden calf incident. In Moses' absence, they felt
"loaded with the burdens of the [Egyptian] people's ornaments, so we cast them (in fire), and thus did the Samiri throw".
Besides obviously being a physical burden, these possessions were more so of a spiritual and moral burden that gradually dawned upon the Israelites, and so they decided to get rid of those sinfully acquired ornaments. They therefore did not initially throw the ornaments with the purpose of moulding a golden calf out of them, until the Samiri entered the scene and placed that idea in their mind, convincing them he would build the calf idol for them
"So he brought forth for them a calf, a (mere) body, which had a mooing sound, so they said: This is your god and the god of Musa, but he forgot".
As stated, the Samiri in addition craftily designed it so that a lowing sound would come out of it, probably produced by wind effects entering the hollow body in order to delude the ignorant and simple people. Ancient people tried giving a semblant of life to their idols, sometimes in a naive manner, simply carving in them eyes or ears
7:197-8"And those whom you call upon other than Him can neither help you, nor help themselves. And if you call them to guidance, they do not hear; and you see them looking towards you, but they do not see".
At other times they were very crafty at animating their idols and the Israelites were no exception, including the "foreigners" that left Egypt with them and that counted among them, according to the Zohar, all the magicians that were impressed and could not replicate Moses' miracles. The Hebrew Bible itself speaks of non-Jews during the exodus, described with a word evoking a vast number, "the multitudes", Ex12:37-38,Numb11:4,15:15-16,Deut1:16. Archeology has shown traces of Egyptians in Canaan and their presence is mentioned at the beginning of Israel's invasion of that land Josh8:35. They most probably were the non-Israelites who are depicted as having heeded Moses' warnings before the exodus, and feared the true God whom Moses spoke of Ex9:20.

The Quran too passively alludes to these non Israelites that followed Moses, in accordance with his function as a liberator not only to the Israelites but also to anyone living in spiritual bondage under Pharao. Among those non-israelites that believed in Moses, the Quran mentions a courageous man from Pharao's close circle, most probably Egyptian, and who was able to escape 40:38-45, as well as the magicians  who came from various cities of the kingdom 26:36-7. They are sentenced to death following their conversion, but given Pharao's immediate concern of chasing Moses and those that fled with him, as well as the Quran's silence on whether the sentence was carried out, whether fully, in part or not at all, one can conjecture that some of those repentent magicians were able to flee with Moses.

As regards the craftiness of ancient people in animating their idols, we read a passage in Ezekiel, where the prophet is transported to Jerusalem and made to see the pagan practices introduced into the Temple
Ezek8:14"And He brought me to the entrance of the gate of the house of the Lord that is to the north, and behold there the women were sitting, making the Tammuz weep".
Rashi explains that 
"There was an image that they would heat up from the inside, and its eyes, which were of lead, would melt from the heat of the fire, and it would appear as though it was weeping, and they would say, “It is asking for an offering.” “Tammuz” is an expression of heating...ie making the heated [god] weep". 
Similarly during the course of their history they had household gods called "teraphim" which were made to emit sounds that the diviners were able to decipher Ezek21:26,Zech10:2.

The samiri would later even claim divine authority, when confronted by Moses; he was visited by an unseen messenger and had sprinkled on the idol the dust collected from the ground on which he walked, a gesture which in his mind, and that of the mislead Israelites, gave divine sanction to the golden calf worship 20:95-6. IT is interesting noting that there is an old tradition among the Israelites ascribing special power to the dust in the footprints of a saintly individual
"a certain woman tried to take dust from beneath the feet of R. Hanina to cast a spell over him to kill him" (Rashi)
Regarding the sound, the Quran of course isnt saying it was emmited at the idol's own behest
7:148"Did they not see that it could neither speak unto them nor guide them in any way?" 20:89"Did they not see that it could not return to them any saying and that it could not possess for them any harm or benefit?". 
This however immediately seduced the Israelites whose
2:93"hearts were soaked with the calf because of their disbelief". 
It is a well known fact even within their tradition, that the Egyptian religions (which included the worship of some bovines like the bull), superstitions, astrology and witchcraft had badly influenced them during their captivity. The adoption of these practices reflects in their writings and Talmudic tradition where for example they attribute Pharaoh's command to cast all newborn into the water the day Moses was born, to the Egyptian astrologers' statement that the savior of Israel has been born Ex1:22. In another oral tradition (believed to have been revealed at Sinai along with the Torah), astrologers are again credited for making a correct prediction following baby Moses' riping a jewel off Pharaoh's crown; Moses will be a threat to the king's rule. Throughout their biblical history, many incidents are explained in their oral tradition, through the lens of witchcraft or sorcery, for example Rashi explains the reason for God's order to massacre the Amalekites as well as their "ox and sheep, camel and ass" because they were sorcerers with the ability to transform into the above mentionned animals.

Long after the exodus and in the times of king Saul down to Solomon and many generations later when the vast majority of them had reverted to polytheism, going as far as endulging in human sacrifice, the community was still involved in those kinds of occult sciences 1Sam28:3,2Kings17:15-17,Isa2:6,Ezek13:18 and the scriptures themselves give credence to some of those practices, like necromancy as in 1Sam28:14-20 where a witch is credited with the ability of summoning the souls of the dead, even the souls of prophets. Again the rabbinical comentaries state that during the time of Isaiah, the monthly prognosticators had a vision but not entirely clear of what was destined to come Isa47:13.

Just as the Quran in the context of the story, eloquently speaks of their hearts being soaked with the love of an idol, Aaron in the HB is aware of that pre-disposition
Ex32:22"Let not my lord's anger grow hot! You know the people, that they are disposed toward evil".
God Himself later on through the prophet Ezekiel would remind them of their ingratitude during the exodus when, despite the downpouring of divine favors after another
Ezek20:16"their heart went constantly after their idols".
The Quranic expression of their hearts being "soaked with the calf" becomes all the more appropriate when one considers how they quickly and eagerly abandoned, in great majority, their pilgrimage to the Temple in Jerusalem and preferred bowing down to the golden calves built by Jeroboam, the king of Israel, who built them in 2 different temples away from the Jerusalem Temple of the kingdom of Judah with which he was in competition 1Kings12. Jeroboam originally used the crafty argument that the Jerusalem Temple was too far to many of them, yet their "soaking" with the love of the calf gave them enough courage to even travel till the furthest boundaries of the land, in Dan, to worship the golden calf built there, and perpetuated the practice for many generations after Jeroboam's death. The prophet Hosea would thus lament in that period, in reference to the heavy inclination of their hearts for idolatry
Hos8:4-5"..[with] their silver and their gold they made themselves idols..how long will they be unable to cleanse themselves?"  
The Quran relates how their eagerness to bow down before false gods manifested itself prior to the golden calf incident, at the beginning of their exodus, even while Moses was in their midst and before his 40 nights/days absence 7:138-148. This is in stark contrast to the Egyptian sorcerers summoned by Pharao to defeat Moses, who instantly declared their faith and persisted despite the cruel torments they were threatened with 7:120-6. They hadnt seen anything in terms of miracles, besides the staff into snake, as compared to the ungrateful Israelites.

When the Israelite nation had reached total spiritual collapse, prompting divine destruction through the hands of the Assyrians, the Hebrew Bible describes in very telling terms their spiritual condition; not only had they abandonned the straight path but they "despised" it and anything associated with it, going as far as doing
2Kings17"what was evil in the eyes of the Lord, to anger Him"
 The prophet Micah was among those sent to warn them of their impending doom, but he could not but lament over te spiritual state of his nation thus
Micah7:1-2"Woe is to me, for I am as the last of the figs, like the gleanings of the vintage; there is no cluster to eat; the first ripe fig my soul desires. The pious have perished from the land, and there is no upright among men".
In many other places it speaks of them acting "against" God or "provoking" Him knowingly Isa1:4,3:8-9,Jer7:18etc. The prophet Jeremiah used another imagery, just as strong as the Quran's "soaking of their hearts" to refer to their deep love for idolatry and all kinds of polytheistic practices
Jer17:1-2"The sin of Judah is written with a pen of iron, with a diamond point, engraved on the tablet of their heart. As they remember their children, [so do they remember] their altars, and their asherim by the green trees upon the high hillocks". 
As an interesting parallel, while the Quran speaks of their hearts, their innermost selves being figuratively filled or soaked with attraction for idolatry, and more precisely the calf, the HB narrates how following his confrontation with them, Moses, in his disgust of them made them to be physically filled with that very calf
Ex32:20"Then he took the calf they had made, burned it in fire, ground it to fine powder, scattered [it] upon the surface of the water, and gave [it to] the children of Israel to drink".
No matter the miracles God performed for the Israelites, they still never truly believed. They could hardly cleanse themselves from their inclination for idolatry as seen in Joshua's address to them as reported in the Hebrew Bible, long after Moses' death Joshua24. Jeremiah later confirmed this fact Jer2:8,8:8,7:18 and history proves their constant straying from monotheism, almost complete disregard for their covenant and scriptures, which started very early on and apparently continued up to the times of Hosea, long after Moses Hos8:5,10:5. The Quran in 5:78 echoed their scolding  by their prophets, from Moses to David Ps78 down to Jesus Matt12,23.

In his lifetime, this tendancy caused Moses immense frustration
Deut29:4"You have seen all that the LORD did in the land of Egypt before your very eyes to Pharaoh and all his servants and to all his land; the great testings your own eyes have seen, and those great signs and wonders. But not even at the present day has the LORD yet given you a mind to understand, or eyes to see, or ears to hear"
and God addresses them in a similar tone
Numb14:11"The LORD said to Moses, "How long will these people treat me with contempt? How long will they refuse to believe in me, in spite of all the miraculous signs I have performed among them?".
Moses is reported to have said that despite witnessing all these signs
"But not even at the present day has the LORD yet given you a mind to understand, or eyes to see, or ears to hear".
"The Mosaic religion was initially a monolatrous religion; while the Hebrews are enjoined to worship no deity but YHWH, there is no evidence that the earliest Mosaic religion denied the existence of other gods. In fact, the account of the migration contains numerous references by the historical characters to other gods, and the first law of the Decalogue is, after all, that no gods be put before YHWH, not that no other gods exist. While controversial among many people, most scholars have concluded that the initial Mosaic religion for about two hundred years was a monolatrous religion. For there is ample evidence in the Hebrew account of the settlement of Palestine, that the Hebrews frequently changed religions, often several times in a single lifetime." (jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/Monolatry.html).

Further reading answering Sam Shamoun "Another Passage Which Exposes Muhammad’s Fraud: The Samaritan Who Didn’t Exist"

Monday, November 16, 2020

Sam Shamoun "How to Become a True Muslim"


The Quran leaves no room to the kind of conjecture trinitarians are known for when approaching their Bible, let alone the Quran. Christians feel comforted whenever they superficially approach the Quran and find these familiar Christological themes. They are sometimes bold enough to assume the Quran is confirming their doctrines. After all, none other than Jesus is referred to as God's word, His messiah or a RUH from Allah. But by doing so Christians are missing the consistent Quranic approach of taking up the major trinitarian themes and labels associated to Jesus, then recasts them in a monotheistic, unitarian perspective. It is the case with the kalima, just as with the RUH/spirit or the name "messiah". Jesus is not the literal nor metaphorical "son of God" but simply, the son of Mary as Christians themselves cannot deny. Similarly, Jesus is stripped from any intrinsic power as regards his ascension and ability to perform miracles. Being the muhaymin/guardian of the previous scriptures and traditions, the Quran could not leave those themes unaddressed. And it does so in an impactful way, using them just as is done in Christian scriptures, while redifining them so as to deny their Christological background.

That corrective function goes beyond these aforementioned pillars of Christology. In the Gospels' eschatology, the trinitarian godhead is at the forefront and Jesus is given the leading role of judgement by his "father" Matt25,26. In the Quran, no possible ambiguity exists as to Allah's supremacy on that day, whether in terms of glory, authority or judgement.

Articles answering Sam Shamoun "How to Become a True Muslim"

Sunday, November 15, 2020

Sam Shamoun "The Quran’s Divine Corporation: Unveiling the Reason Why Allah Speaks in the Plural" (3)


On the Day of Judgement, all things in the heavens and earth will come to God as obedient slaves 19:93. None will be allowed to speak without God's permission, whether in the heavens and earth and up to the highest ranked angels and whatever will be spoken will be the truth 11:105,78:37-8. He alone will allow intercession 10:3,39:44 as He pleases 34:23 meaning any unqualified "intercession" on that Day by those who have been granted the authority of intercession, on behalf of people whom Allah has not deemed worthy will be rejected 
74:48"the intercession of intercessors shall not avail them". 
Allah alone decides who will intercede on whose behalf 
53:26"And how many an angel is there in the heavens whose intercession does not avail at all except after Allah has given permission to whom He pleases and chooses". 

The prophet in fact stated that those who will earn his intercession wont be those that will call upon him, rather 

"The luckiest person who will have my intercession on the Day of Resurrection will be the one who said sincerely from the bottom of his heart "None has the right to be worshipped but Allah".  

There are several ahadith of that nature and conveying the same message; 
"Allah will gather all the human being of early generations as well as late generation on one plain so that the announcer will be able to make them all-hear his voice and the watcher will be able to see all of them. The sun will come so close to the people that they will suffer such distress and trouble as they will not be able to bear or stand. Then the people will say, 'Don't you see to what state you have reached? Won't you look for someone who can intercede for you with your Lord' Some people will say to some others, 'Go to Adam.' So they will go to Adam and say to him. 'You are the father of mankind; Allah created you with His Own Hand, and breathed into you of His Spirit (meaning the spirit which he created for you); and ordered the angels to prostrate before you; so (please) intercede for us with your Lord. Don't you see in what state we are? Don't you see what condition we have reached?' Adam will say, 'Today my Lord has become angry as He has never become before, nor will ever become thereafter. He forbade me (to eat of the fruit of) the tree, but I disobeyed Him . Myself! Myself! Myself! (I am preoccuied with my own problems). Go to someone else..." 
Those people seeking unqualified intercession will then call upon other eminent prophetic figures, including Nuh, Ibrahim, Musa, who will all decline, citing their fear of Allah and some of their worldly shortcomings 
"Jesus will say. 'My Lord has today become angry as He has never become before nor will ever become thereafter. Jesus will not mention any sin, but will say, 'Myself! Myself! Myself! Go to someone else..." 
At no point does the hadith associate the shortcomings of the prophets with sins, or that Allah's anger is directed at them for their deeds. This is seen from Jesus' answer, who although without sin, will not be of any help either. What the hadith shows is that due to their humility as imperfect creatures standing in front of the Creator, even the prophets will not deem themselves worthy to do anything beyond what Allah explicitly allows them to do. Being in the presence of Allah on that day will be such a humbling experience, that the prophets, when questioned will not even deem it appropriate to pretend to possess any knowledge, in comparison to the All-Aware 
4:41,77:11,22:78,28:75,39:69,7:6-7,5:109"the Day when Allah will assemble the messengers and say, "What was the response you received?" They will say, "We have no knowledge. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen".

The manner in which truth will be made manifest on the day of resurrection will be so evident, that the question here becomes of rhetorical nature. This is seen by the messengers' reply; their testimony will not be meant at adding information, but merely confirming Allah's all-encompassing knowledge, for He is ultimately sufficient as a Witness 4:166,6:19.

Even while the Quran raises the hypothesis of an entity interceding without God's approval and that intercession being consequently nullified by God, it says that such entities; whether prophets or angels are nothing but God's honored servants, fully encompassed by Him, never preceding Him in speech because of their awe and never acting except by His command. They would consequently never take that initiative of interceding without His permission 
20:110,21:26-28"and they do not intercede except for him whom He approves". 
Not only are these beings, angels, prophets or saints, powerless by themselves and incapable of altering God's decisions, but they themselves seek for means to get near to God and hope for His mercy 17:56-7. If that is the case, that they have no interceding power by themselves and that even if they did, they would only be allowed interceding on those whom Allah has approved, then how far removed and deluded are those that seek their help directly instead of Allah?

In fact the Quran equates the belief in unqualified intercession/mediation with God as a denial of His omniscience and thus showing the sinner the gravity of his assumption 
13:33,10:18"And they serve beside Allah what can neither harm them nor profit them, and they say: These are our intercessors with Allah. Say: Do you (presume to) inform Allah of what He knows not in the heavens and the earth? Glory be to Him, and supremely exalted is He above what they set up (with Him)".  

That authority of intercession is thus granted by Allah on behalf of certain people only; those who did their best to deserve it and who have a deeply ingrained faith which they accepted in full consciousness 
2:255,19:85-87,21:28,6:15,43:86"except one who testifies to the truth while they know".
 Intercession is only for the pious 20:109. It will not be for those who did nothing to deserve it, who pay no regard at all to Divine commandments 2:48,26:100,40:18,74:48. This means intercession is nothing but a mark of honor and elevation of the selected righteous on Judgement Day 19:85-87. It is a great reward in itself. Any believer will feel honored and uplifted if he is accompanied on Judgement Day in his prayers to God, by a being so pious that he is selected by God Himself and given a platform to speak at a time where none will be allowed to do so except by His will. 

This will strengthen the believers and remove from their heart the terror of that day, especially when the interceding entity will further confirm God's judgement concerning them 34:23. The fact that intercession is not a pleading action, but only a mark of honor and psychological support of the righteous is reinforced through 16:111 stating that on Judgement Day 
"every soul shall come, pleading for itself" 
and that 
28:70,18:26"He does not make any one His associate in His Judgment". 
After judgement has been passed, no intercession will be admitted 40:48-50. Some dwellers of Hell, after spending their appropriate time in it, will be ready for admittance into Heaven. At that point God will honor them by allowing the intercession of the pious beings. Some reports depict the prophet as eventually allowed to speak on the behalf of these select few 
"and then I will intercede and He will put a limit for me (to intercede for a certain type of people). I will take them out and let them enter Paradise". 

It is thus clear that in the Quran, intercession honors the one on whose behalf it is made. But it is even more honoring to the one actually making the intercession. This is due to the high level of restriction on that Day, with very little occasions to speak except as allowed by God. 

Nowhere in the Quran does Allah nor His prophets command us to ask a personality or entity to pray to Him on our behalf or that a believer's prayer in itself is not worthy enough to be considered. First and foremost, the call of prayer is only true when directed at Him 
13:14"To Him (alone) is the call of Truth; and those to whom they call, besides Him, will answer them nothing, but like one who stretches his two hands towards the water so that it may reach his mouth, while it does not reach it. And the prayer of disbelievers is only in error". 
To corroborate, the Quran repeatedly reminds us of God's nearness to the one seeking Him 
11:61"surely my Lord is Nigh, Answering"
 nearer than one's jugular vein, and that He answers the humble supplicant's prayer 
27:62,40:60,42:26,37:75,50:16,2:186"And when My servants ask you concerning Me, then surely I am very near; I answer the prayer of the suppliant when he calls on Me, so they should answer My call and believe in Me that they may walk in the right way". 
An interesting linguistic observation is God's instructions when believers ask the prophet about Him. He is so near that the answer to the question to the prophet isnt given in the indirect form "answer, reply or say to them..." but in a direct manner by God, to the asker, regardless of who he is or what is his inner and outward condition, no matter the timing, illustrating his nearness to the servants 
"i am near". 
Another striking statement from within the verse is that the second part speaking of the asker implementing in turn spiritual uprightness in his own life isnt a pre-condition for God receiving and answering a supplication. It is placed second and said to be for the asker's own good, unrelated to the supplication itself.
He isnt unapproachable like the tyrants and arrogant leaders of this world, nor is He far away and detached from His servants' realities.
 
Throughout the Quran, the prophets never told their people to ask them to intercede on their behalf and instead consistently urged them to mend their ways, turn directly to Allah and ask His forgiveness by themselves 
11:52,61,89-90,27:46,41:6,71:10,2:199"Then hasten on from the Place from which the people hasten on and ask the forgiveness of Allah; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful" 
but, just like the compassionate angels ask forgiveness for all who are on earth as they constantly see their ingratitude and transgressions 42:5 because 
13:6"most surely your Lord is the Lord of forgiveness to people, notwithstanding their injustice"
these prophets grieved much over the spiritual condition of their nation (as Muhammad is often depicted in the Quran) so they would also pray to God on behalf of both believers and disbelievers 9:80,24:62,60:12 out of humanity and compassion 
3:159"Thus it is due to mercy from Allah that you deal with them gently, and had you been rough, hard hearted, they would certainly have dispersed from around you; pardon them therefore and ask pardon for them"
 just as a son would ask God for the forgiveness of a father and vice-versa 
60:4,9:114"And Ibrahim asking forgiveness for his sire....most surely Ibrahim was very tender-hearted forbearing". 
This type of empathy, not only is not forbidden, but is actually encouraged as a great virtue which all believers should perform 4:48. Similarly when we are told to pray for God's compassion on our own parents 17:24, it is to keep us aware of their own compassion towards us, as a token of gratitude 
"And make yourself submissively gentle to them with compassion, and say: O my Lord! have compassion on them, as they brought me up (when I was) little".

In 4:64 it speaks of the hypocrites who caused great harm to the prophet and the community in general, saying how God will forgive them should they go to the prophet, then pray by themselves and in addition are joined in their prayers by the prophet. It only commands the hypocrites to go to the prophet (as a peaceful gesture and demonstration of good intentions since their mischief was foremost aimed at him) and to ask God's forgiveness by themselves. It doesnt command them to ask the prophet to intercede on their behalf and neither does it say they wouldnt be forgiven had the prophet not joined them in prayers. In fact it doesnt even command the prophet to pray for them. It simply states what the compassionate prophet will do should they leave their treachery towards him and the community and come to him in sincere repentance, thus proving their resolve in action by abandoning their enmity towards him. This statement is meant at encouraging reform, one is more likely to make a step towards reconciliation knowing that the opposite party will wholeheartedly welcome him. In that case, the prophet will automatically join them in prayers without them having to request it 9:102-3. There is a timeless lesson in regards to Allah's boundless mercy. If even the sinners opposing a prophetic envoy are forgiven should they put an end to their behavior and reform themselves, then what is to say of sinners and those that oppose Allah and His religion outside the prophetic era?

The Quran obviously doesnt forbid this empathy, it doesnt prevent the prophets from being compassionate towards their people, and more particularly their family members, just as it doesnt prevent the prayer of any father on behalf of his child as seen in Jacob's case. His sons had attempted murdering their brother and did not consider themselves worthy of addressing God directly. So they asked their father instead to be their intermediary with God, to plead for their forgiveness 12:97-8. This was their own conjecture and not a command from God. The Quran does not leave any deadlocks, and always opens the way to forgiveness, even to the worst sinners provided they repent in sincerity and reform themselves. Nowhere does the passage state that Jacob's prayer in itself earned his sons forgiveness. 

Not in one instance does the Quran command or advises the believer to pray through an entity for a faster or more favorable answer. It would be in complete opposition to God's description as being closer than the jugular vein, the One Who accepts the sincere repentence of the worst sinner of this world
 2:186"surely I am very near; I answer the prayer of the suppliant when he calls on Me".
He is near. No need to go left and right to reach Him, a straight line is enough. Had it been of any necessity or "added value" why arent those most in need of it, such as the oppressors waging war for the destruction of Islam not advised to seek the help of a pious entity to be more likely forgiven but are instead simply told to 
5:34"repent...know that Allah is Forgiving, Merciful". 
In fact the Quran lays out the principle that man only gets what he strives for by himself 53:39.

The only pre-requisite for God's forgiveness is the sinner's sincere resolve to mend his way and act righteously, as amply said throughout the Quran, regardless of whether he is joined in prayers by someone pious or not. This is demonstrated in 4:64 where the "coming" of the hypocrites to the prophet is a prerequisite to their forgiveness. It shows their sincerity in their claims to have abandonned their treacherous ways towards him and the rest of the community. On the other hand in 48:11-12 or 63:5 the insincere hypocrites' request to the prophet that he asks for God's forgiveness on their behalf is rejected 
48:11-12"who can control anything for you from Allah if He intends to do you harm or if He intends to do you good; nay, Allah is Aware of what you do". 
This implies that Allah's decision will be on the basis of the knowledge that He has about the reality of their actions. If they deserve punishment no prayer of his will earn them forgiveness; and if they do not deserve punishment, no harm will be done to them whether he prays for them or not. Allah cannot be deceived so even if the prophet was to accept their request and pray for their forgiveness on the basis of their alleged sincerity, it will be vain and without result just as the prophet Ibrahim's prayer for his father, due to a previous promise he had made, was ultimately vain in God's eyes 9:113-4,60:4.

God makes it thus clear that some transgressors are not deserving of any mercy and forgiveness, despite the compassionate pleas of the prophets and the believers 9:80,9:113-114,63:6 just like God tells Jeremiah in the Bible concerning the most obdurate transgressors among the Israelites Jer7,11:14,14:11. As stated by Ezekiel in his warnings to Israel, the righteousness of the few and their prayers will not deliver the guilty when the time comes Ezek14:20. Noah before him was told to stop praying for the salvation of his own disbelieving son, let alone his transgressing nation as whole 11:37-49.

This means that God's forgiveness really is contingent on the sinner's own sincere repentance and resolve in obedience 
9:104"Do these people not know that it is Allah alone Who accepts the repentance of His servants and approves of their propitiatory offerings, and that Allah is indeed Forgiving, Compassionate?".



Further reading answering Sam Shamoun "The Quran’s Divine Corporation: Unveiling the Reason Why Allah Speaks in the Plural"

Sam Shamoun "The Quran’s Divine Corporation: Unveiling the Reason Why Allah Speaks in the Plural" (2)


19:64-65 is an independant passage. It does not belong to the discourse that precedes and that follows it. The preceding passage ends with the good news of heaven to the righteous and what comes after it is about the deniers of the resurrection. 19:64-65 is in between and addresses the issue of piecemeal revelation. The timing is entirely dependent on Allah's will, Who controls the process every step of the way until its destination. One should therefore submit to His wisdom in that regard and remain steadfast in His worship.

From among the disbelievers, the most prominent misleaders are brought forth 19:69. The next verse states 
19:70"We do certainly know best those who deserve most to be burned therein". 
This indirect form of address, starting at v66 with a people's denial of the resurrection, is called tabaaid in Arabic, or distancing. It is meant at expressing the speaker's discust towards the addressees who arent worthy of being directly spoken to. We know however from the context that they are the most prominent of the misleaders who deserve the worst punishement. The Quran then, in its typical manner of executing its threats, switches from the indirect, to the direct form, catching its audience off-guard 
"And there is not one of you but shall come to it". 
This parenthetical statement, of which the Quran abounds due to its very nature as an interractive speech seeking to keep the audience ever attentive to its message, points directly at the disbelievers who are hearing the message of the prophet, telling them they cannot escape 
18:53"And the guilty shall see the fire, then they shall know that they are going to fall into it, and they shall not find a place to which to turn away from it". 
The 'you' in 19:71 is a direct address to all the disbelievers as an actual threat, with the additional warning that 
"this is an unavoidable decree of your Lord". 
Then the Quran mentions the "delivery" of the believers, how they will be spared such disgraceful situation of humiliation on their knees and begging to be saved 
"And We will deliver those who guarded (against evil), and We will leave the unjust therein on their knees". 
The "delivery" of the believers is again mentionned in 39:61 and how no evil and grief will even touch them 
"And Allah shall deliver those who guard (against evil) with their achievement; evil shall not touch them, nor shall they grieve". 

Even among the commentators that argued the believers will be made to enter hell, none of them stated they shall be made to suffer in it. So harmless that experience will be that some reports describe the believers after entering paradise, not even aware they were in hell prior 
“The people of paradise said after they entered paradise, ‘Didn’t our Lord promise that we will enter hell?’ and they will be told, ‘You entered it and found it ashes.’”

The experience is depicted as a mercy from Allah. The believers are made to see, but not experience, a place that could have been theirs had it not been by Allah's guidance and grace.

When Judgement is laid down on a Day where none can harm or benefit the other 34:42, they will hate their own selves 40:10. They will realize, not only that they are now accountable for the actions they were mislead into comitting, but also for misleading others in turn 43:67. Their earthly ties will crumble and will begin denying one another, cursing eachothers 29:25. The followers will request a double punishement for their leaders 38:61, asking to see them to trample them and make them of the lowest 41:29. 

That bitter dissension among the sinners and their misleaders during their judgement and following their entry to hell, incessantly disputing and quarrelling 36:59-64 is in stark contrast with the dwellers of heaven who shall greet and speak to one another with the best words of prayers, sit face to face, symbolizing their whole heartedness in being in eachother's company
10:10,44:53,52:20"Reclining on thrones set in lines" 
Nothing symbolizes peace of mind, purity of intentions and mutual love more than the free manner of sitting in front of one another.  

These same leaders will disavow their followers like Iblis will disavow his followers since none of them can be discharged from their moral responsibilities and none were forced in making their conscious choices 
14:22,34:32,37:29-30"They shall say: Nay, you (yourselves) were not believers. And we had no authority over you, but you were an inordinate people".

Sam Shamoun "The Quran’s Divine Corporation: Unveiling the Reason Why Allah Speaks in the Plural" (1)



4:64,21:25,67:17-18,70:40-1,31:10-11,25:45"Have you not considered (the work of) your Lord, how He extends the shade? And if He had pleased He would certainly have made it stationary; then We have made the sun an indication of it"

As so often in the Quran, the sudden change, within one and the same sentence, from the pronoun We or I to He, or from We to God, breaks the monotony of the speech and thus keeps the reader/audience's attention alert. Besides that literary purpose, its higher, spiritual meaning is to impress upon the listener or reader the notion that God is not a person but an all-embracing Power that cannot be precisely defined or even adequately referred to within the limited range of any human language 
16:51"And Allah has said: Take not two gods, He is only one Allah; so of Me alone should you be afraid". 
This is a typical example of the well known and established pre-islamic style of iltifat. A dim resemblence of that ancient mode of expression can even be found in the Hebrew Bible, for example 
Zech10:12"And I will strengthen them by the Lord, and by His Name they shall walk, says the Lord". 
See also Ps50:22-23,81:17.  Here again the text shifts midsentence between God and the prophet, sometimes overlapping in a way that makes unclear who the speaker is Isa10:12,Jer8:17-9:1,11:17,Amos3:1-7.

Iltifat means transition, but the Quran makes its former use by the masters of poetry of the time pale in comparison. Here is another example 
15:95-99"Surely We will suffice you against the scoffers. Those who set up another god with Allah, so they shall soon know. And surely, We know that your breast straitens at what they say. Therefore celebrate the praise of your Lord, and be of those who make obedience". 
God is here mentioned more than once and through different pronouns, so that we have a multiplicity of viewpoints:
- the 1st person plural of majesty to assure the Prophet "We will suffice you". It is an established style in classical Arabic to refer to a powerful, authoritative entity in the plural 23:99. God of course does not need to convey His royalty through such words; it is the people who need it. Semitic languages used the plural to convey the sense of majesty since before the Torah or the Quran. God communicates with the people in the language they understand, and so He chose to convey the notion of majesty in those terms as well, but with higher eloquence. Something interesting is that the Quran, a Book that uniquivocally stresses divine unity, protects the concept so as to avoid any ambiguity whenever the 1st person plural (never the 2nd or 3rd persons plural) WE/NAHNU is used. The direct context immidiately states that God is One, either through the use of the singular Allah/Rabb, or through, elaboration or switch in pronouns, as in 
17:2"And WE gave Musa the Book and made it a guidance to the Children of Israel, saying; do not take a protector besides ME (not US)". 
Something else to keep in mind is that, the prophets who conveyed these revelations in which God uses the royal plural in reference to Himself, never spoke of God indirectly with a 3rd person plural pronoun "they" or "them". The Quran took the concept of royal plural, which was well known in semitic languages (see for example the HB in Mal1:6,Gen3:22,Gen24:9,Ex7:1) to a different, sophisticated literary level.  

- the second viewpoint that the style of iltifat offers in that passage 15:95-99 is that of the mockers. They serve another God beside Allah "Those who set up another god with Allah". God is here distancing Himself from them. This style is called tabaaid in Arabic, or distancing, meant at expressing the speaker's discust towards the addressees who arent worthy of being directly spoken to. 

- and the 3rd viewpoint that the style of iltifat offers in that verse is that of the Prophet, he should serve his caring, reassuring Lord and Sustainer "We know that your breast straitens at what they say".

A longer statement would have been needed to convey these implicit meanings had "normal" grammatical rules been followed. 

There is a reason why the masters of eloquence of the time could not but call the Quran magic and sorcery. Just as was done above with a few examples, a close examination of all instances where these shifts occur in person/numbers/addressees/verb tenses/case marker/noun instead of pronoun, etc, shows that they follow similar patterns, and are not haphazardly injected in the flow of the text. 

Another sub category of iltifat is the use of nouns instead of pronouns. The aim is to create a sense of exclusivity. For example in 2:115 where Allah's name is repeated 3 times instead of using a pronoun. Stating the name of Allah, moreover, in the 3 successive statements makes each statement absolute, independent and quotable.

The entire Quran is a discourse from Allah alone, transmitted to the prophet Muhammad by the angel Gabriel. It isnt God's autobiography for it to be cast wholly in the form of 'I' and 'me'. It quotes many different speakers, past, contemporaries to it, or future, like prophets, angels, regular believers or close companions of Muhammad, jinn, Iblis and more. It reports in Arabic the communications in different languages, and by different entities, belonging to both realms of the unseen and the seen. It even sometimes quotes inanimate entities made to speak for a specific purpose. These quotes, including those made by entities unable to emit sounds are obviously not, in most cases, the verbatim statements, rather the meaning into Arabic of their particular type of communication. Hence sometimes the variations in wording when the Quran translates their communication in different places throughout the book. An Arabic word chosen in one narration of a story conveys one aspect of the original communication, while another closely related word used instead in a retelling of the same story may convey an additional shade of meaning that was present in the original communication.

All this is achieved while actively interracting with the reader or audience, sometimes involving it in the flow of the discourse. It remains in all cases God's word, whoever it quotes, whoever it "commands to proclaim" as denoted with the recurrent "qul".
 When Allah speaks through the prophet starting with "qul", the words spoken afterwards do not become the words of the speaker, for example 
39:10"Qul (Say/Proclaim/Declare/State/Mention), “O My servants who have believed, fear your Lord. For those who do good in this world is good, and the earth of Allah is spacious. Indeed, the patient will be given their reward without account."
 In the Hebrew Bible, the book of Ezekiel is full of verses addressing the prophet beginning with "say".
By its nature as a flowing speech, it would be contrary to eloquence for the Quran to constantly cut its flow whenever it is about to quote a character, especially while relating a dialogue. That is why the text is highly elliptical, with eloquent and appropriate omissions that never disturb its flow and precision. This dramatic style of the Quran puts the audience in a position where they seem to hear the words directly from the speakers — not through a narrator.

Many times the revelation quotes Allah directly, or another entity without starting with the "qul" formula or without "x person said or replied". The style and contextual indicators are therefore enough to determine who the speaker is, whether it is during an exchange between several interlocutors, or when it is reporting the statement of a single entity. That person is then either directly quoted, paraphrased, or instructed on what to say in a given situation, context or ritual. Among the examples concerning the believers specifically, the Quran instructs them how to start certain endeavors or suras of the book with the "bismilla", or teaches them either within a larger sura or in a complete sura, like sura fatiha, how to verbally seek Allah's guidance.

 In the HB God says to Moses 
Ex33:19"I will proclaim the name of the Lord before you"
 ie I will teach you how to worship Me. In the book of Jeremiah, after a long admonishment, the prophet begins quoting, without any transition, a prayer of repentance to be uttered by the believers Jer3:22-5. 

Iltifat is a device also used for other than God, and similarily for specific eloquent purposes such as the switches from 2nd to 3rd persons to create an effect of distancing of displeasure 16:72,47:23, distancing of honouring 30:38 or helplesness 10:22. The shift in addressees as in 17:63 with them/you creates a powerful effect: anyone that follows Satan at any time or place is thus addressed directly by God with this strong warning, rather than merely being informed that any one of 'them' will meet with such a reward. 

A further note on the concept of plural in reference to God in the HB. Jews often used fatherly and godly names to describe all sort of things: in 2Corin4:4,Exod7:1 Satan, Moses are called god (theos, elohim). When Moses was made "elohim to Pharaoh", his nature was not reconfigured into 3 entities in 1. Similarly, in the beginning elohim created the universes Gen1:1. The plural elohim does not denote a plurality of God's nature. If the meaning of this word were to be plural, then the verbs would agree, also being in the plural. The word for "created" is "barah" in the singular. And although Elohim is followed by the plural k'doshim, the very next word after it is the singular "he" pronoun, referring to God. The use of the plural simply is a literary device to evoke grandeur and majesty, and is often used in the Tanakh and the Quranic language as well.

The "im" at the end of Eloh-im is an intensive construct of the singular Eloah ps18:32,114:7 as is used at the end of many words that are not plural Gen19:11(blindnesses), Lev19:24(praises), Ps45:15(gladnesses), Ezek25:17(vengences). 

To know if elohim is singular or plural it must be in a sentence where it either receives a plural suffix, a plural verb, a plural adjective. The only times where Elohim is followed by plural verbs is when referring to heathen deities Exod20:3, which ironically could be seen as a little hint to those who use that literary construct to defend a concept seen by many as pagan. 
The other times where elohim is followed by plural is when the addressee is a heathen as in Gen20:13, where Abraham speaks to Abimelech. Everywhere else in the surrounding text the singular verb form is used with elohim. 

The same is the case with the plural adjective hayyim connected to the majestic plural elohim in Sam17:26,36,Jer10:10,23:36 while all surrounding verbs with Elohim are in the singular. It is to be noted that the singular form of "hayyim" is used elsewhere with Elohim 2Kings19:4,16,Isa37:4,17. Elohim, when referring to God in the Greek of the NT is always the singular "theos". YHWH speaks of Himself as “I” and “Me” and is referred to as “You” (singular) and “He” and “Him” thousands of times. Elohim simply doesnt hint to 2,3, or a million godhead within one, so it offers no support for the trinity.

When it is translated in the plural for example Ps8:5,82:1,Exod18:11,21:6,22:8,9,Gen35:2,and in all these cases nobody will think elohim constitutes a plurality of persons within one. When elohim is translated in the singular Ex22:20,1Sam28:12-13 again no trinitarian will say the english translation of the word constitutes a plurality of persons within one.

The HB describes God with singular pronouns over 11000 times. Singular pronouns tell us that God is a single Individual. The expression "let us" of Gen1:26 is isolated and doesnt indicate duality, trinity or a hundred members of the godhead. Again, the pluralization of words for intensification of the meaning is common in semitic languages. Many examples have already been given, and in different contexts, another one being Ezra 4:18. Just as Isa44:24 says it is Myself not Ourselves "who spread out the earth" Jesus says in Matt19:4,Mk10:6,13:19 etc that HE or God, not WE, created all things alone. And again in In Heb4:4 God not Jesus or the holy spirit rested from the work of creation. Similarly in 
Job38:4"Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation?"
 not We.
  
The Midrash Rabbah cited in Rashi’s commentary on 
Gen1:26"Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachman said in the name of Rabbi Yonathan: At the time when Moses was engaged in writing the Torah, he had to set down what happened on each (of the six) days of creation. When he got to the verse "And God said, 'Let us make man in our image, after our likeness' " (Gen. 1:26), Moses said before Him: "Master of the universe, why do You give heretics an excuse? (they will say that there are numerous deities!)" He replied: "You write! and whoever wishes to err, let him err.""