Tuesday, December 8, 2020

Sam Shamoun "The Incomplete Quran Revisited: The Story of Ishmael" (1)


When in the Torah, Ibrahim prayed that Ismail might live "before the Lord", he was asking God that his firstborn and only son at the time be dedicated to His service at the altar. Anyone familiar with that terminology knows that throughout the Hebrew Bible, it applies to dedication to God, besides its use for the offerings made to God. Accordingly, Ibrahim settled his only son in a place where he would live "before the Lord" and worship Him 2:127, right besides the altar of sacrifice. Ibrahim prayed God that this Holy Shrine remain a purified sanctuary for the righteous pilgrims 2:125, that this unforgiving location be turned to a hospitable place for those seeking it 2:126,14:37,28:57 that he and his descendants remain free from worshiping idols

14:36"surely they have led many men astray; then whoever follows me, he is surely of me, and whoever disobeys me, Thou surely art Forgiving, Merciful".
Ibrahim asked that his descendants keep up prayer and be protected until the Day of Resurrection 14:40.

Judeo-Christian apologists often wonder as to the distances involved in Abraham having to travel between Beersheba where he had settled his family through Sarah and Mecca, where the Muslim tradition states he had settled his family through Hagar. From the beginning as he set himself out of his native area, Ibrahim travelled distances surpassing the Beerseba-Mecca distance, which is an approximate 10 days journey.. It was nothing out of the ordinary for frequent travelers, nomads, or traders to undergo 20 or 30 days journeys even in harsh terrains, so why would it be the case for an obedient servant of God whom Judeo-Christian tradition itself admits he was so submissive in his obedience that he set out to sacrifice his son to God. Neither did he hesitate to leave everything behind his native Ur in Chaldea, for a far away and unspecified location, in obedience to God Gen11.
His travels, they happened by foot, donkey's back, and he made many stops along the way, pitching his tent, building worship sites and altars, a practice that continued among his descendants. He used a donkey as he went to prepare the sacrifice of "the only son" Gen22. It is also to be noted that to the ancient, town-dwelling Hebrews the term "wilderness of Beersheba" comprised all the desert regions south of Palestine, including the Hijaz.


Sam Shamoun "More of the Incomplete Quran Exposed: Who or What Is Ahmad?"


These articles answer Sam Shamoun "More of the Incomplete Quran Exposed: Who or What Is Ahmad?"

Sam Shamoun "Muhammad the Sinful Transgressor Revisited"


After describing their outstanding moral and spiritual qualities, the Quran nevertheless asks the prophets to keep seeking istighfar/protection (from sins), for themselves and their followers too 47:19 and several prophets are quoted throughout the Quran asking for ghafr 30:24,35,71:28. God is described with the word "ghafur", steming from Gh-F-R meaning covering something. That covering can be for the purpose of hiding, or protecting, as well as both. The implication is that God provides a covering upon the person to hide the sins of the past in case there were any 5:65 all the while providing a protection from the potential sins of the future, by increasing the person's spirituality. It is up to the believer to maintain that covering of protection throughout his life. If he loses it, he is again exposed to moral and spiritual failure. His past sins will remain hidden/forgiven but the future ones will have to be rectified 14:10"He calls you to forgive for you OF your sins". This, as a side note, strikes at the notion of guaranteed salvation and forgiveness from sins -past and future- which is propounded by certain belief systems and more particularly Christianity.

The believers and prophets have always asked God to provide them with ghafr, the covering that hides and/or protects. It comes with merit as often repeated in the HB Ps23:1,85:3 but its implications far surpass in value the level of merit needed to obtain it. God only requires in exchange sincerity and resolve in walking aright.

Like in all languages, Arabic has synonyms that convey similar but nuanced meanings. For instance the word taqwa. It also is used in the sense of "protection", but always opposite a danger and always including the element of fear, because fear is an emotion that makes one aware of the consequences of being in a certain situation. The Quran refers to it as a spiritual garment making one fearful of being exposed both physically and spiritually 7:26. That nuance between ghafr and taqwa is obvious in 
40:7"Forgive (faighfir), then, those who turn in Repentance, and follow Thy Path; and preserve them (waqihim) from the Penalty of the Blazing Fire"
The angels ask Allah to cover the sins of those that repent, with forgiveness, and to guard them from Hell. This is done by making them aware of the danger of that destination, with fear being the biggest dissuasive force. That precisely is why the word waqihim is used. The Quran explains in many places that Hell is unfathomable. The Quran only uses hints, through loan images derived from our worldly experiences, so that we may form an approximate picture of it. These hints are meant at making hell a threat and warning, that we might dread it 
101:10,104:5,37:62-65,39:16,17:60"a trial for men..and We cause them to fear, but it only adds to their great inordinacy" 74:35-7"Surely it (hell) is one of the gravest (misfortunes), A warning to mortals, To him among you who wishes to go forward or remain behind". 54:4"And there has certainly come to them information that in which there is deterrence".
Many aspects describing hell are said to be a trial and warning. The threat of hellfire, its graphic description throughout the book is actually a mercy from God, akin to those educational programs where inmates are encouraged to speak about the awful places in which they dwell, in order to reform potential criminals or discourage people from making the choices that could lead them there. It is like a shock therapy meant at breaking stubbornness and unreasonable denial. Once that is achieved and that the warning is heeded, most will consider honestly listening to the message and ponder upon it

Going back to the issue of prophets seeking the ghafr from Allah, this way the Quran teaches an important lesson; when the foremost among God's servants are denied any sense of complacency, then how far should regular believers be from harboring a feeling of perfect righteousness or prideful accomplishment in front of God
53:32"therefore do not attribute purity to your souls; He knows him best who guards (against evil)". 
The believer should keep in mind that only God is perfection and as a demonstration of his understanding of such concept, should constantly seek God's forgiveness for any shortcoming as well as protection for future potential flaws and blemishes. This concept is pervasive throughout the Quran, starting with the single most repeated sura, sura fatiha. 

This type of spiritual humility is requested even from those that perform the most commendable deeds of the religion, so that they never fall into arrogance and self-righteousness 73:1-20. It was under this state of mind that the prophet implored his Lord for ghafr in this world, just as he will do in the hereafter 66:8. 

Some reports say he used to implore Allah for protection one hundred times every day, as he was commanded by the Quran itself. And he used to do so even after 48:2 was revealed telling him his past, present and future sins are forgiven. He did so out of humility and to set the standard of modesty in face of divine perfection 
"The Prophet used to offer night prayers till his feet became swollen. Somebody said, to him," "Allah has forgiven you, your faults of the past and those to follow." On that, he said, "Shouldn't I be a thankful slave of Allah?" 
No human, no matter how close to Allah in terms of revelational experience, will ever be faultless. This verse 48:2 does not say what type of sin, intentional or not, major or minor, was committed by the prophet. Dhanb, etymologically means an action that results in harm. This can be a sin, or otherwise, intentional or not. For instance Moses spoke of his inadvertent killing of a man as dhanb 26:14. No indication of major sins, let alone intentional, are found concerning the prophet, anywhere in the hadith corpus or the Quran. Yet we find the Quran reproaching him even the slightest unfitting action for a man of his standing, actions which none would find problematic.
 

This is the etiquette that Islam has taught to man. No matter how selflessly one might have exerted himself to please the Creator, one should never entertain the thought that he has fulfilled the right his Lord had on him wholly, the Sustainer who maintains him and the universe at each instant. Rather he should always think that he has not been able to fulfill what was required of him. This reveals an important point, something the prophets have always been aware of as seen in their constant prayers for forgiveness and protection, the inherent imperfection of humans, their shortcomings in the face of divine perfection. One should therefore never feel self-righteous or self-sufficient in any endeavour. The prophet said 
"All the sons of Adam make mistakes/khatta'in, but the best of those who commit mistakes are those who are given to repentance".
When a prophet of God, the last human capable of willfully sinning, asks for God's mercy not even following a sin, but out of fear of not performing an act of worship to its full extent, then how much more so should the regular believer be conscious of his shortcomings in regards to God?

The prophet, and the Muslims through him, is told to do the following, after seeing the unfolding of the prophecy of entire victory 
110:3"Then celebrate the praise of your Lord, and ask His forgiveness; surely He is oft-returning (to mercy)". 
In addition to teaching man spiritual humbleness, this also conveys the idea that should one attain some victory, it should not lead to pride and vanity, but to remembrance of God and gratitude, as well as seeking ghafr/covering, protection from sins. Even if the prophecy proved true in the days of Muhammad, and even more so today as Islam is still spreading worldwide, a believer shouldnt be boastful about it as many Muslims usually are when speaking of the spread and success of their religion.

This is the characteristic of the men of God, who never become complacent and arrogant, whether in their duties towards fellow men or towards God, especially so when they reach the climax of their power and glory and that before that point they were constant and steadfast upon the straight path regardless of their ordeals. Success instead causes them increase in spirituality and far sightedness in their dealings with men and their duties towards God. Among God's prophets those that exemplify the most such a pattern are the prophets Muhammad and Yusuf 
12:100-1"And he raised his parents upon the throne and they fell down in prostration before him, and he said: O my father! this is the significance of my vision of old; my Lord has indeed made it to be true; and He was indeed kind to me when He brought me forth from the prison and brought you from the desert after the Shaitan had sown dissensions between me and my brothers, surely my Lord is benignant to whom He pleases; surely He is the Knowing, the Wise. My Lord! Thou hast given me of the kingdom and taught me of the interpretation of sayings: Originator of the heavens and the earth! Thou art my guardian in this world and the hereafter; make me die a muslim and join me with the good". 


Further reading answering Sam Shamoun "Muhammad the Sinful Transgressor Revisited"

Sam Shamoun "Muhammad and the Ten Commandments" (2)

Acts17apologetics denounce sexual promiscuity; Islam allows concubinage? 




Sam Shamoun "The Incomplete Quran Strikes Again: A Showdown with Nimrod?"



In the Quran, the idea of tiredness is completely excluded from God's creative work 46:33. God's establishment over the throne symbolises His constant dominion upon creation. He has not relinquished its rule in favor of others nor has He made the whole of His creation or any part of it independent like a clock running by itself. He has instead kept in His own hands the functioning of the whole universe. The ending of these verses with 
"surely His is the creation and the command"
refer precisely to this; after creation comes the command, symbolized by the establishment on the throne
32:5"He manages and regulates every affair from the heavens to the earth. Then, it will go up to him, in one Day, the space whereof is a thousand years of your reckoning".
In fact the Quran is silent about a seventh day in the history of creation, where the Bible depicts God as seemingly collapsing on a throne following a tiresome task. Rather, God creates in six days only and then establishes Himself upon the throne of power, commanding and controlling all things.
Had His management abandoned the world of existence for one single moment, the organization of them all would have perished 22:65,35:41. 

This is the point driven through by Ibrahim in his discussion with the unnamed ruler of his nation (later Quran commentaries identify him with Namrud/Nimrod). What transpires from the portion of the debate quoted in the Quran is that the point of contention was not God's existence, rather His presence in man's life. His point of contention with Ibrahim was that his Sustainer is not concerned with all worldly matters, is mostly absent from man's life. Ibrahim refuted that point by reminding him of God's constant command of the natural laws upon which all life depends. He did so after the king's heedlessness to the first argument; God is the origin of the mechanism of life and death which all organisms are subject to. The ruler used ridicule to maintain his position, in the manner that the arrogant possessors of power often do. Instead of considering the deeper meaning of Ibrahim's argument, he alluded to the giving of life and death in an indirect manner, he also had the power to inflict death and give or allow life. This exposed the spiritual heedlessness of the king. Ibrahim then dumbfounded him with an argument he could not, even with his spiritual shallowness and corrupt belief in God, dismiss as he had previously done. 

The Quran, through the image of God establishing Himself on the Throne which means in pretty much all languages the king's dominion, is saying that Allah Himself is governing the whole of His creation and He has kept all the powers and the reins of government in His own hands and whatever is taking place in each and every part of the universe is happening with His command and permission
30:25"And one of His signs is that the heaven and the earth subsist by His command".
It refutes the idea that Allah had become unconcerned with man after creating him and let him alone to seek other supporters for help. Rather He has taken the responsibility of making arrangements for his guidance, protection and fulfillment of his needs. This is done by providing means by which both aspects of the human being can thrive; the spiritual, through the innate perception of higher truths 23:78,46:26,67:23,76:2 as well as sending divine guidance 2:38-9,7:35-6,20:123 and the physical through the continuous maintenance of the universe and its laws 35:41. There is a reason why the Quran, in its surgical precision, describes Allah with His attribute of infinite mercy, when it mentions His establishment over the throne that encompasses all of creation 
20:5"The Beneficent One/al Rahman, Who is established on the Throne". 
No word enshrines the concept of constant care of every aspect of the functioning of the universe, more that the superlative Qayyum which reoccurs in the Quran, and no verse comprehensively explains it like ayat al kursi does 2:255.


Sam Shamoun "Blame it on the Gecko! Muhammad’s Skewed Understanding of Original Sin"




These articles answers Sam Shamoun "Blame it on the Gecko! Muhammad’s Skewed Understanding of Original Sin"

Monday, December 7, 2020

Sam Shamoun "The Muhammadan Fraud That Was Ahmed Deedat: Which Bible?"


Muhammad was inspired following the same pattern as other known illustrious men before him were, including many unnamed and forgotten ones, whether among the tribes of Israel (Jewish tradition holds that thousands were sent to them) or outside of them
 4:163-4"We inspired towards you as We inspired towards Noah and the prophets from after him. And We inspired towards Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the children (of Jacob)/alasbat and Jesus and Job and Jonah and Aaron and Solomon. And we brought to David, Psalm. And (We sent) apostles We have mentioned to you before and apostles we have not mentioned to you; and to Musa, Allah addressed His Word, speaking (to him)." 
Alasbat is derived from the root S-B-T to describe the many long branches of a single tree. It does not mean tribe, rather descendants. That is why the plural asbat is maintained when speaking of the division of the Israelites into 12. Each tribe is composed of many descendants. 

In the creeds of Jews and Christians, one must acknowledge the superiority of one prophet above all others. In Islam, one must surrender such prejudice and desires by revering them all equally. The Quran in addition admonishes against the attitude of claiming belief in God but rejecting a particular prophet 4:150. Those who do so simply do not like the message from the God they claim to believe in, it threatens their sinful ways and prevents them from pursuing their evil interests.

Muslims are warned not to fall in the same prejudice and error of the Jews and Christians who each gave such absolute reverence to a particular prophet that they regarded and still do, the acceptance of a new prophet with a different message as a denial of the superiority of their revered figure. 

This Islamic principle extends to the angelic messengers. Rejecting the last Revelation does not only result in rejecting their own scriptures. It also entails rejection of Gabriel who has revealed it to the Prophet's heart by Allah's Command, not by his own wish. So they were ultimately disbelieving in God
6:33,2:98"Whoever is the enemy of Gabriel for surely he revealed it to your heart by Allah's Command, verifying that which is before it, and guidance and good news for the believers. Whoever is the enemy of Allah and His angels and His apostles and Gabriel and Michael - so surely Allah is the enemy of the unbelievers".
To reject any messenger, as is here stated concerning Moses against whom the Israelites rebelled 44:19 is equal to rejecting the One that sent him. Similarily, Gabriel is one of Allah's honored servants, just like Michael and others; they have no authority except to follow and obey the Divine Commands. That is why the Quran speaks of the belief in the carriers and transmitters of revelation -angels or human messengers- as an article of faith 2:177,285. 
The verse 2:98 exposes another side of the Israelites' rejection. Their hatred and grudge against Muhammad's prophethood took them to the extent of inventing the tale that Gabriel was an enemy of theirs because he was the Angel of destruction. This in their eyes was among the justified reasons for rejecting Islam. Had the angelic messenger been Michael, who brings prosperity, they would have believed. Whether Islam was true or false, this argument was ludicrous. Angelic messengers, as corroborated in their own books, have no free will and act only according to God's directives. They do not willingly take sides, much less among humans.

Further articles answering Sam Shamoun "The Muhammadan Fraud That Was Ahmed Deedat: Which Bible?"

Sam Shamoun "Allah’s Wishful Thinking"




This article answers Sam Shamoun "Allah’s Wishful Thinking"

Sunday, December 6, 2020

Sam Shamoun "Muhammad’s White Devil"


Allah bears witness that what has been revealed to His Prophet has been done 
4:166"with His knowledge, and the angels bear witness too and Allah is sufficient for a witness". 
Merely coming down from the heavens was not sufficient to prove its divine origin. It could have been done through satanic agencies, or could have been polluted with confusing falsehood had God not made all necessary arrangements that no evil spirit could interfere with it. God and the angels commanded to deliver the Quran 2:97,80:11-16 bear witness that the revelation right from the start of its descent, to its reaching down to the prophets and up to its communication and delivery to the people is duly protected and guarded against change and alteration, from whatever source it might come. And God encompasses his messenger and protects him from any evil interference during all these processes 
10:61,72:26-28"He makes a guard to march before him(the messenger) and after him, so that He may know that they(the messengers) have truly delivered the messages of their Lord, and He encompasses what is with them, and He records the number of all things" 19:64"and we(angels of revelation) do not come down but by the command of your Lord; His is whatever is before us and whatever is behind us and whatever is between these". 
All prophets were confronted to the machinations of evil spirits, trying to interfere with their desire to establish the truth. They did so through any means they could, such as by inciting their enemies further against them, propagating falsehood, attempting to make them compromise some of their principles with their enemies'. But God protects His message from corruption and ultimately defeats their falsehood and obstacles, and establishes the Truth instead 6:56,22:51-55,41:26,68:9,10:15,17:73-4. As a side note, one demonic entity, rarely spoken of in the Arabic literature is named al Abyad, meaning white, and in some weak ahadith he is said to be particularily going after the prophets. The prophets however were immune to his suggestions. When he attempted to deceive Muhammad by taking the form of Gibril, the latter came down 
"and put his hand between him and the Prophet and pushed him (al-Abyad) gently. By this, he was thrust away from Mecca and landed in the furthest parts of India." 
Contrast this immunity granted to the true prophets, with the shining light convolutedly appearing to a certain Saul, sworn enemy of Jesus, convincing him to infiltrate the movement of his disciples and alter its foundations. Paul himself exposes his tortured inner self, when he mentions the satanic angel constantly pursuing him 2Cor12. It is no surprise then that he disliked the restrictions of the Law, seeing it as a curse.

As to amulets
"the prophet said: Verily, spells, amulets, and charms are acts of idolatry". 
Even Quran amulets/talismans, although not a prophetic practice, all schools of Islamic thought agree that their only virtue is in reminding one to invoke the sacred words they contain. This further undermines the already dubious report attributed to ibn Ishaq in al-Shifa of Qadi ‘Iyad. It was suggested to the prophet that he might be victim of incantations for an evil eye prior to revelation. It is known that in the beginning, the prophet would be progressively visited in dreams, then when awake so as to be prepared for the coming down of what 59:21"splits mountains asunder". 
When revelation began and he was overwhelmed 
"Khadija asked him: “Shall I send someone to you to make a talisman for you?” He replied, “No, not now". 
The report, besides being absent from the relevant section of Ibn Ishaq’s work (as well as from Ibn Hisham's compilation of his teacher's work), has no chain of narrators. The most that it shows is that those that cared for the prophet proposed a solution they thought would stop the supernatural experiences he was going through, which he actually declined.


Sam Shamoun "Hafs: The Lying, Unreliable Transmitter of the Quran"


The hafs reading is named after Hafs ibn Sulaymaan not because he initiated it or transmitted it, but because he recited best and in a most outstanding way one of the authentic qiraat traced back to the prophet. His qiraa/recitation is the one he learned from Aasim ibn Abi an-Najud, a tabi'ee, meaning the generation that met the prophet's companions but not the prophet himself. Aasim learned his recital from Abu abd al Rahman al Sulami who learned from the Caliph Ali ibn Abi Talib. 

Aasim had several students reciters and Hafs was but one of them who excelled most. Although Hafs was rejected as a hadith narrator, a science that is completely unrelated to the art of Quran recitation or capacity to memorize, he was however never questioned in the field of recitation itself, neither by those who deemed him untrustworthy in hadith nor by his fellow students. 

As to the fact that Hafs would borrow books to copy them without returning them, with the only specific case mentionned being a book from his contemporary student colleague Shu'bah, what is important to mention firstly is that only Shu'bah made that claim, which is why no other explicit example of borrowing and not returning exists. Second, it was nothing strange and in fact the norm back then for even powerful narrators to borrow eachothers' books and copy the narrations they contained into their hadith collection. As to not returning Shu'bah's book, this could have been due to many things other than "stealing". Nobody ever accused Hafs in that context of being a book thief!


Further reading answering Sam Shamoun "Hafs: The Lying, Unreliable Transmitter of the Quran"

Sam Shamoun "How Muhammad’s Sunna Trumps the Quran Once Again!"



This article answers Sam Shamoun "How Muhammad’s Sunna Trumps the Quran Once Again!"