Saturday, November 14, 2020

Sam Shamoun "Muhammad the Womanizing Sensualist" (2)


As to Layla bint Khutaim/Khatim, she offered herself to the prophet at a seemingly advanced age. Ibn Saad reports how she was with her 2 daughters and 2 grand daughters when the prophet arrived in Medina. The prophet accepted her marriage proposal, probably as he thought it could help improve her situation. Upon learning of the news, her people urged her to ask for a divorce, which the prophet granted her, citing the reason that 
"Evil is what you have done! You are a jealous woman and the prophet has several wives who are jealous about him and will invoke Allah against you". 
As a side note, there is a notoriously flawed mistranslation of that report gladly picked up by the enemies of Islam 
"you are a self respecting woman but the prophet is a womanizer". 
The Arabic says "anti imra'atun ghira/you are a jealous woman" "wal nabi sahib nisa' tagharin alayh/and the prophet has women jealous for him". 

Further readings answering Sam Shamoun "Muhammad the Womanizing Sensualist"

Sam Shamoun "Muhammad the Womanizing Sensualist" (1)


When God promises to bless Abraham's progeny, he does so indiscriminately as reflected both in Gen12,17 and the Quran in 3:33. The promise of spiritual leadership extended to the RIGHTEOUS among the descendants of Abraham because of his pure obedience not unconditionally to any one branch, Israelite or Ishmaelite 2:123-141,37:113. God is not bound to anyone group 2:89-90. His guidance is open to all of humanity indiscriminately 39:41,10:57,14:52. 

The Quran doesnt remove the Israelites from the Abrahamic promise, but restored the righteous among the Ishmaelites to their rightful place as being bearers of this same promise. The prejudiced and ethno-centred Israelites in the times of the prophet Muhammad went to great extents in trying to hide this reality. The Quran relates how they openly favoured polytheism to Islamic monotheism in order to appease the Meccans. This is unsurprising to anyone familiar with their history as described on their own books, treacherously allying with one another's pagan enemies for the fleeting benefits of this world. They knew the Arabs would naturally assume that they, monotheists like Muhammad, were most likely to adhere to his message. This made the Meccans hesitant in allying with them against Islam. 

To appease their suspicions, the Jews would publicly deny the concept of prophethood altogether, even paying their respects to the idols. They denied God had ever revealed Books to prophets previously
 6:91"Allah has not revealed anything to a mortal. Say: Who revealed the Book which Musa brought, a light and a guidance to men, which you make into scattered writings which you show while you conceal much? And you were taught what you did not know, (neither) you nor your fathers". 
The traditions speak of a delegation of Medinite Jews sent to Mecca after the battle of Uhud, seeking to form a political alliance 
"Your are people of Scripture and Muhammad has a Scripture and we are not completely sure that this is a scheme that you devised. So if you want us to go along with you, you have to prostrate to these two idols and believe in them". 
The Quran flagged them with a description that echoed throughout history, past, as attested in their own books, present, as they were doing during the rise of Islam, and modern 
5:80"You will see many of them befriending those who disbelieve; certainly evil is that which their souls have sent before for them".
The Jewish delegation preferred revering the idols whom their prophets warned them against, so as to reassure the Quraysh 
2:109,4:51"Have you not seen those to whom a portion of the Book has been given? They believe in idols and false deities and say of those who disbelieve: These are better guided in the path than those who believe". 
Up until 4:54, the passage relates the same prejudiced theme the Jews had in regards to prophethood. They could not fathom how would God favor another nation in that aspect. But they were told and reminded that the object of their envy, ie prophethood, when it came in the line of Ibrahim, it was never meant to be the prerogative of one branch or another. It was given to Ibrahim's progeny indiscriminately.  Ibn Kathir reports how ibn Abbas explained the Jews' "envy" towards the Muslims
 "We are the worthy people, rather than the rest of the people". 
This contradicts al-Suyuti's strange reason of revelation of 4:54 also attributed to ibn Abbas; "The people of Scripture said: 
“Muhammad claims that he has been given what he has been given; yet he is humble. But he has nine wives and his main concern is to have sexual intercourse (with his wives). Which dominion is better than this?” 
It would be strange for the Jews to envy the prophet for having 9 wives when their own scriptures put no limit on polygamy, beside the fact that this "envy" is in relation to the Muslims in general not to the prophet in particular, as accurately interpreted by ibn Kathir.

This attitude of the Jews toward Quraysh and their favouring of the latter's paganism over the monotheism of Muhammad was in sharp contrast with the attitude of the Christian Negus of Abyssinia who sheltered and protected the early days persecuted Muslims of Mecca 
5:82"Certainly you will find the most violent of people in enmity for those who believe (to be) the Jews and those who are polytheists, and you will certainly find the nearest in friendship to those who believe (to be) those who say: We are Christians; this is because there are priests and monks among them and because they do not behave proudly". 
Christians in addition, contrary to the Jews, do not hold the arrogant belief of a special relation with God; their "priests and monks" teach them humility. Christians also reject the Jewish notion of unconditional, everlasting chosenness as the leading spiritual nation to mankind, drawing them closer to the Muslim understanding of religion from that aspect.

The Israelites were blessed was because of Abraham. Abraham heard the voice of the Lord and obeyed, and because of this, God promised his descendants spiritual leadership of humanity 
53:37"Abraham, who to his trust was true". 
The purpose of mentioning this attribute of Abraham to both the Quraysh/Ishmaelites and the People of the Book/Israelites is to admonish them that the high status achieved by Abraham in this world and in the next was the result of showing complete obedience and faithfulness to God. He earned that honorary status and his descendants too would have to earn it 
2:140-1"That is a nation that has passed away; theirs is that which they have earned and yours is what you earned; you shall not be questioned for what they had been doing". 
A nation should rely upon its own deeds, not on its past history. 

This Abrahamic promise is thus conditional, provided his descendants faithfully fulfill certain obligations. As Jesus says in the NT 
"And do not think you can say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.' I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham".  
After they were tasked under oath to be the bearers of the truth to the nations, the descendants of Isaac were sent many prophets from among their own people, some of them distanced by 400 years such as Malachi and Jesus. The sending of many prophets isnt a blessing but a stain against them because the majority of these prophets were sent to bring them back to the right path, as stated in the HB, to remind them of the terms of the covenant. Jesus alludes to this multiple times, especially in his parable of the King, who sends his servants, and finally his son whom they murder. Jesus tells them that as a consequence their nation will be destroyed and a new nation will come forth which will establish the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth. History bares witness that what the Israelites failed to do with multiple Prophets, the Ishmaelites did with one.

In Sura Baqara, the Israelites are thrice reminded 2:40,47,122 how Allah made them a great nation, through the prophets and revelations that made them a beacon of spiritual light. But as they turned away from the straight path, forsaking the ways of righteousness, they became unworthy of that exaltedness. Their history of greatness and failure serves in the Quran as an example to the new Abrahamic nation. 

Where a line of the children of Ibrahim failed and were consequently deposed from their responsibilities, despite the sending of numerous prophets among them, the other line believed and held fast by what was revealed to them. 

The believers in the times of the prophet were those told to ignore the prejudiced talk of the Jews and focus on what was revealed upon them 
45:16-9" And certainly We gave the Book and the wisdom and the prophecy to the children of Israel, and We gave them of the goodly things, and We made them excel the nations..Then We have made you follow a course in the affair, therefore follow it, and do not follow the low desires of those who do not know.."

As to the efforts of some (mainly, if not only, Bible-ignorant Christians) to exclude Ishmael's progeny (or any other non-Israelite branch) from potential chosenness for prophehood based on Ishmael's supposed exclusion from the Abrahamic covenant, firstly, God in the Torah is reported to have announced several covenants with Abraham, not only one, and none of them is related to prophethood being the sole prerogative of one branch or another. In Gen15:18-21,17:2,8,10 we read about the covenant of dominion over the land of Canaan by Abraham's offspring, the covenant that would increase his descendants in numbers, and the covenant of circumcision of his male children including all those living in his household that are not his male offspring. We read in Gen17:17-27 that Ishmael was made fully part of the covenant of circumcision. This practice remained among some of the pre-islamic Arabs of Mecca that had maintained the tradition. The passage also says that the covenant of blessed and fruitful nation will apply to Ishmael. 

The only covenant that isnt explicitly mentionned as covering him is the one of dominion over the land of Canaan. This is why God in Gen17:19 is reported to have accepted and did not deny Abraham's request that Ishmael might "live before the Lord" (an expression of righteousness and sacrifice to God). But God added further qualification in relation to the land covenant 
(judaica press translation) "And Abraham said to God "If only Ishmael might live before you!" And God said, "Indeed, your wife Sarah will bear you a son, and you shall name him Isaac, and I will establish My covenant with him as an everlasting covenant for his seed after him.." 
That is the covenant continuously spoken of all over the Hebrew scriptures as applying to the Israelites only, lamented over, prophesied about to be restored following every destruction. This covenant will eventually forever be reinstated in the Messianic era. See for example Jer11:1-5 or when Isaiah prophesied the renewal of the covenant he stated
 Isa49:8"I will make you for a people of a covenant, to establish a land, to cause to inherit the desolate heritages". 
The psalmist remembers the covenant in this way 
Ps105:9-11"Which He had made with Abraham, and His oath to Isaac, And He set it up to Jacob as a statute, to Israel as an everlasting covenant, Saying, "To you I shall give the land of Canaan, the portion of your heritage."" 
A reminder of that covenant with the seed of Isaac, and it being related to land rights is reiterated in 1Chr16:15-18. King David, in his last days, as he gathered the leaders of the community and announced his succession through his son Solomon, as he told them that the responsibility to build the Temple to shelter the Ark of God would rest upon his son, he reminded everyone that 
1Chr28:8"And now, before the eyes of all Israel, the congregation of the Lord, and in the ears of our God, observe and seek all the commandments of the Lord your God, in order that you inherit the good land and bequeath it to your sons after you forever".

Sam Shamoun "Muhammad: The Signless Prophet"


The Quran does not say the last prophet cannot do any miracles by God's will. Before getting into that, let us just take a look at the HB.

Deut13 warns the people to be very suspicious of anyone with the ability to perform what may seem as unexplainable supernatural deeds. The NT similarly says false prophets may be allowed the performance of miracles as a matter of test to the believers Matt24:4-5,23-25,2Thess2:9-10. John the Baptist was a true prophet but performed no supernatural miracles Jn10:41,Matt21:25-26. Jesus, despite the spectacular wonders he performed, failed doing so when challenged by his opponents. 

Compare this to Muhammad whose miracle of eloquence was made available for all. His opponents labelled it magic and sorcery, as they could not accept its message while the Muslims believed it as God-sent. This is the typical reaction of one bent on denying the truth, who will always find an excuse to remain in disbelief
15:15"Even if we had opened opened a gate for them in heaven, and they had begun to ascend through it during day time, they would have said; our eyes have been dazzled, nay we have been bewitched".
Their constant demand for a "sign" although they would obviously never believe it no matter how clear it is, even if it came in accordance with their desires, was thus rejected, just as Jesus did. In 6:111,10:95-101 Allah speaks of those who continuously reject His communications, they will not believe no matter what sign is shown to them. All scriptures speak of such rejectors bent on denying revelation no matter what. In fact if they truly wanted a sign and werent instead seeking excuses for their disbelief, they would have at least considered the surrounding signs that point to the realities of which the Quran speaks of verse after verse. But the fact is these obdurate disbelievers see the Truth only when the promised divine torment in this earth or death overtakes them, just as Pharao came to believe only when he was drowning.

When Jesus was challenged by the wicked Pharisees to display supernatural wonders as he did in his ministry, he answered them
Mk8:11-13"Why does this generation ask for a miraculous sign? I tell you the truth, no sign will be given to it."
Jesus categorically denied them the performance of Signs. True to his word, Jesus never appeared to those very people who demanded him a miracle after his alleged resurrection. Although as a side note he is depicted as saying elsewhere that he will indeed reappear resurrected to them Matt12:39 yet in reality he never did. In fact the risen Jesus never appears to anyone but believers. Those stubborn disbelievers demanded miracles to excuse their unbelief.

The demand of a sign in itself is not condemnable when it is motivated by a desire of assurance of an already existing, sincere belief. Even prophets requested such signs from God, seeking to know the reality, the functioning of concepts like the resurrection 2:259-60. This is because prophets often had to face the staunchest barrages of calumnies and opposition, and would thus seek personal comfort, requesting to see miracles on a private level and not to vindicate themselves publicly. However when such demand is but a challenge with the aim of comforting one's disbelief, a mere display of mockery, then God either rejects the demand through His prophets or immediately punishes the culprits. This happened to the Jews who, after witnessing all sorts of signs and wonders in Egypt and during their journey, still demanded to see this God whom Moses claimed to have conversed with 2:55,4:153.

When some challenged similarly the prophet Muhammad, arguing that the absence of supernatural wonders is the reason of their disbelief, they are told that they instead have no real desire in them to seek the right guidance. Miracles do not conform to the whims and demands of such people, neither does Allah force belief upon anyone 10:99 much less if the person deliberately turns away from it. He lets such persons wander in their own ways 13:27.

In the NT Jesus reiterates the principle that miracles were only granted to those who desired them to confirm their faith, as Abraham or Gideon before (Judges6), and to grant satisfaction to those that already incline to truth. Miracles are not for those who
6:109"swear by Allah with the strongest of their oaths, that if a sign came to them they would most certainly believe in it. Say: Signs are only with Allah; and what should make you know that when it comes they will not believe?". 
Thomas and Philip for example Jn14 believed and inclined to the truth but wanted satisfaction and clearing of some remaining doubts. Jesus used the miracle argument to comfort them, he is not addressing unbelievers and trying to convert them using miracles, he is addressing believers and reminding them of his miracles as a support to some specific claim. Same in Jn11:1-44. In fact we even read in Mk10:46-52,Matt9:27-30 how it is faith that actually causes Jesus' miracles to succeed.

In Nazareth, Jesus was unable to do "powerful works" because he was not believed in. In Luke24 Jesus, after his crucifixion and alleged resurrection, encounters 2 men who declare their disbelief in Jesus, thinking that his mission had failed. Instead of revealing his identity which would have been a compelling evidence for them to believe, scolds them for their disbelief in scriptures which he claimed he fulfilled. His demand was to have faith in scriptures without the need to resort to supernatural evidence. Jesus alludes to this reality again in a parable where a disbeliever put in hell requests the performance of a miracle to his people -who possess and know the scriptures- still on earth that they might believe
Lk16:19-31"If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead".
The Quran, after mentioning the various miracles of Jesus, points that these were signs for the believers 3:49. Jesus, and the few other Prophets through whom God showed miracles, werent going around town squares performing magic tricks to awe passers by, or clapping their hands to cause rainfall upon request.

Simon, Peter, James and John did not need the slightest miracle to believe in Jesus' prophethood Matt4,Jn1:35-51 but all are said to "believe" in Jesus a second time after they saw his miracles and that is because it strengthened their already existing belief Jn2:11. 

When Moses was sent to announce the future deliverance of the Israelites, he was strengthened with miracles and sent to the elders of the community, those grounded in knowledge, devoted to study, already inclined to the truth and knew God Ex4. They were those who would first and foremost believe Moses' words and this is because they had preserved and faithfully transmitted the knowledge, that God would eventually remember them and lead them out of Egypt into the land promised to Abraham Gen50:24-25. The sign would be that one would come to them with the words matching exactly that promise and therefore Moses was commanded to remind them of it with the same words as sufficient proof of his prophethood Ex3:15-18.

From a purely comparative viewpoint, supposing Moses or Jesus' miracles were productive and crucial in supporting their missions as well as gathering followers, which they clearly were not, as seen from how readily the Israelites strayed from the path during and after Moses, as well as the very few number of followers in Jesus' lifetime despite all the miracles he showed. The fact remains that, like every action, a miracle is only temporary in nature and can not be seen twice. It disappears and becomes history as soon as performed, leaving those that did not witness it to rely at best on those claiming to have seen it. This issue in itself isnt really problematic so long as the line of prophethood hasnt been discontinued yet, since the subsequent prophet will perform his own miracles and endorse the prophet who preceded him. And the cycle would continue.

With Muhammad, the case was different. He was the Final of the prophets. His prophethood had to be asserted through miracles different than those bestowed in support of the likes of Moses, because no action can last long enough to be seen by other generations. Nor could he rely on the endorsement of a subsequent prophet. Thus the nature of the miracle that had to serve as decisive evidence of his truthfulness had to be of a different type. It had to be lasting in order to be witnessed and tested by the future generations as well as by his contemporaries. For that purpose, nothing was more adapted to the technology of the time than a miraculous speech, recorded in writing, preserved through a divine pledge as opposed to every past scripture, so that its superiority in terms of the truth it conveys, as well as the intricate subtlety of its content be witnessed and tested at any time by any generation to come. That is why the Quran repeatedly points to itself as proof of prophethood, although nowhere is it denied that the prophet could or did perform miracles of the type of "wonder workings". The ahadith contain more details, and the Quran passingly alludes to the disbelievers witnessing such secondary signs but remained in denial 2:118,37:14-15,38:4. Among such signs was the instance where the moon was split for all to see 54:1.

The Quran thus never denies the prophet Muhammad's ability, by God's will, of performing miracles the types of which his opponents demanded. It however drives home the point that the divine wonders will never be made to conform to the whims of the disbelievers.

Besides, to base one's faith on the sight of "miracles" is very dangerous for one never really knows whether the "miracle" was in fact an illusion or other clever trick. The prophet Moses' opponents reflected that reality when they described his miracles as illusion without external reality
7:132"And they said; whatever sign you bring us to bewitch us, we are not going to believe you".
As the HB says, God may even purposefully allow a false prophet to perform miracles as a test to the people, whether their hearts and minds will be dazzled and swayed into ungodly ways or remain steadfast in their faith. In Ex7:11 Pharaoh commands his court magicians to imitate with their magic Moses' miracles, and some of these miracles were in fact successfully replicated, showing that seemingly supernatural occurrences do not necessarily come from God. 

Miracles therefore, whether in the Quran or the HB, do not serve the function of attesting to an individual claim to prophethood, rather have the twofold purpose of comforting an already believing heart as well as demonstrate the tremendous responsibilities of those that witness it.

The Bible doesnt even give instructions on how to recognize demonic miracles because technically, they are no different than the divine ones. But it shows how to recognize if the author is a false messenger. The djinn, as described in the story of the prophet Solomon, are capable of what is deemed supernatural bending of the expected laws of nature. But what they have no access to, except as Allah deems fit, is knowledge of the unseen, information that could only be obtained through revelation. Knowledge of the unseen, and of information that could not have been accessible to the messenger, prophecies coming true, uprightness of character are all very strong indications of a person's claims of prophethood. That is why the Quran, although it never denies that its messenger could and did perform miracles, treats this aspect of prophethood as inconsequential in determining the veracity of the claim, dismissing the requests of the doubters and disbelievers and leaving the matter to the Creator. The sending of signs is at all times depending in His will and wisdom. The Quran therefore, in its arguments, brings repeated attention the aforementioned 4 aspects of prophethood, with an additional focus on knowledge; based on what authority, and knowledge do the disbelievers among the polytheists and people of the book persist in their denial and deviations 
46:4"Say, [O Muhammad], "Have you considered that which you invoke besides Allah? Show me what they have created of the earth; or did they have partnership in [creation of] the heavens? Bring me a scripture [revealed] before this or a [remaining] trace of knowledge, if you should be truthful."
In conclusion, messengership does not necessitate that the forces of nature be bent at will and upon request. Miracles are entirely dependent on God's will and the prophets are nothing but mere mortals tasked with transmitting a message of warnings and glad tidings
17:90-3"And they say, we will by no means believe in you until you cause a fountain to gush forth..or you should cause the heavens to come down...or bring Allah and the angels face to face...or you should have a house of gold...Say; Glory be to God, am I aught but a mortal messenger?"

Further reading

 When disbelievers demand a miracle

Sam Shamoun "The Quran Testifies: Jesus is the Eternal Creative Word of God"