Friday, November 13, 2020

Sam Shamoun "Muhammad’s Family In Hell: How Allah Dishonored his “Prophet”" (5)


In Islam the issue of moral, spiritual accountability is well defined. It is established that only God knows who was effectively and sufficiently exposed to the truth before willfuly rejecting it. 
The responsible ones are those who 
68:43"were called upon to make obeisance indeed while yet they were safe (saalimun)". 
This word indicates full possession of the power of judgement. The Quran states that for individuals to reject the divine guidance while in a state of being "saalimun", this can only happen if the truth conflicts with their paradigms, desires, and worldly interests, and essentially stems out of pride, prejudice and arrogance hence its condemnation. Analyzed objectively and rationally, Islam can never conflict with one's inner conscience. That is why one always finds an element of subjectivity based on worldly interests, whenever someone with a decently working rational mind rejects Islam after all questions are properly answered within the islamic paradigm. Such people do not reject Islam because they are stupid. If they go through a serious introspection, they will point out those worldly reasons specific to them. No philosophical objection a disbeliever will raise but it will be common to every monotheistic system. There are answers that better explain these problems from a theistic view rather than atheistic. That is why such people will most often resort to objections in regards to Qur'anic statements or ahadith, which turn out to be genuinely based on poor knowledge as well as the desperate need to pile up as much layers of excuses as possible so as to cover for the real, base, worldly reasons for rejecting Islam.

Therefore one only becomes accountable for rejecting Islam 
47:25,6:49,4:115"after guidance has become manifested to him" 
something the guilty himself will recognize in the hereafter 67:9. This is the central condition for responsible choice of creed 
22:17"Surely those who believe and those who are Jews and the Sabeans and the Christians and the Magians and those who associate (others with Allah)-- surely Allah will decide between them on the day of resurrection; surely Allah is a witness over all things". 
This establishes that whoever, Muslim or else, follows his religion with sincerity and isnt guilty of rejecting divine ordinances out of pride, prejudice or arrogance, stubbornness and unflinching stance despite the clear explanations, that person will have his sincerity in his own faith judged according to God's knowledge, wisdom, justice. In fact the Quran when quoting an exchange between the prophet Musa and Firon, explains that Allah alone decrees the destiny of those who were not reached by divine guidance for He alone knows their motives and understands the cause of their choices. He alone can appreciate their spiritual merits and demerits 
20:48-55,17:54"Your Lord knows you best; He will have mercy on you if He pleases, or He will chastise you if He pleases" 15:24-5"And certainly We know those of you who have gone before and We certainly know those who shall come later. And surely your Lord will gather them together; surely He is Wise, Knowing" 25:58"and Sufficient is He as being aware of the faults of His servants". 
God adds to Moses' answer that common sense and the observation of nature must lead a person to a basic cognizance of a unique Creator. God has created in man the innate ability to come to such conclusion through reason and observation. That hardwired spirituality also leads one to understand the great evils and make the essential correct spiritual choices. Each person is thus at least responsible for his response to that basic guidance even if it isnt directly spelled out to him. 

That innate guidance is the essential thing separating us from animals. Contrary to us, morally accountable creatures, animals are not blameable for certain acts like unjust killings (infanticide) or detestable practices (cannibalism) that humans, regardless of their religion or belief (or lack of belief) in God outright reject. 

This innate guidance must be nurtured or it degrades and dies, leaving its host without any proper moral and spiritual compass. The neglect and degradation of this God-given tool is something the individual will have to answer to before God 7:172-3,75:2,91:7-10. This might have been the spiritual, moral condition of the prophet's own parents whom the ahadith depict as being in the fire. So for anyone, Muslim or else, to be included among the successful in the Hereafter, indiscriminately, regardless of faith and appellations, described in 64:9 as "whoever believes in Allah" then their belief in God will have to be in accordance with their innate guidance and common sense, and the nature of their deeds may not conflict with their innate capacity to understand good and evil. This means that in any case, a deed is only good because it is in accordance with God's revealed principles. 

However, some are at a disadvantage even when it comes to hearkening that basic, ingrained guidance. They are those brought up in a heavily corrupt environment. God will definitely take this factor into account as seen with the Queen of Sheba's case whose disbelief was blamed on her corrupt environment and sinful conditioning 27:43. However that conditioning can still be reversed once guidance is properly conveyed to them or when they leave their atmosphere, as equally seen with the Queen who reformed herself after coming in contact with the prophet Solomon who demonstrated to her what constitutes spiritual uprightness. 

Some lack the mental capacity to discern the truth and arent therefore accountable for failing in this regard 
36:62,35:37"Did We not preserve you alive long enough, so that he who would be mindful in it should mind?" 
If a person has died before attaining such an age, ie "long enough to be mindful" he will not be called to any account according to this verse. However, the one who has attained this age will certainly be held answerable for his actions and from that point on, for any positive or negative answer to the opportunities of spiritual betterment. Other people despite possessing their full intellectual capacities havent been properly explained the teachings of Islam, and thus logically cannot be held accountable for rejecting something that was misrepresented, willfully or not, to them 
3:163,6:132"And all have degrees according to what they do; and your Lord is not heedless of what they do" 46:19"And for all are degrees according to what they did, and that He may pay them back fully their deeds and they shall not be wronged".
These intricacies are impossible to be fully encompassed by the human mind so that someone, in this world, may declare another to be destined for Heaven or Hell. Not even a divinely appointed prophet may do such a thing 
46:9"say: I am not the first of the messengers, and I do not know what will be done with me or with you: I do not follow anything but that which is revealed to me, and I am nothing but a plain warner" 39:62"He alone has the power to determine the fate of all things" 31:34"and no one knows what he shall earn on the morrow; and no one knows in what land he shall die; surely Allah is Knowing, Aware". 
When on the Day of Judgement, the prophets and messengers are called to testify as to the answer of those reached by their message, they will humbly reply 
16:84,89,7:6,5:109"We have no knowledge, surely Thou art the great Knower of the unseen things". 
These noble witnesses only knew of that outward response which was made to them, but only Allah knows how the message was received by each individual, how far the rejecters were or how far the followers truly believed and remained true to it during and after the death of the messengers. In the words of Jesus on the day of judgement 
5:117"I did not say to them aught save what Thou didst enjoin me with: That serve Allah, my Lord and your Lord, and I was a witness of them so long as I was among them, but when Thou didst cause me to die, Thou wert the watcher over them, and Thou art witness of all things". 
Only divinely guided messengers and prophets and nobody else, are able to clear all misconceptions and falsehood and explain things in such a way that if one denies the truth then he can be pointed out as an "unbeliever". He is then inflicted with divine retribution. But even then, disbelief has many degrees and circumstancial factors hence even the prophets being unable to say whether such unbelievers are destined for hell in the Hereafter. 

So when 64:9 describes the successful in the Hereafter with an indiscriminate phrase, applicable to Muslims and non-Muslims alike, as those "who believe in God and do good", it enforces that any appellation becomes irrelevant if one refuses believing in God as is taught in the Quran when it reaches them. This is clearly attested by the direct context of the verse. 64:9 gives two inseparable conditions to be among the successful in the Hereafter:

- the first condition is Belief in God, meaning at least in accordance with the innate guidance and common sense (for those not reached by the revelations), or as prescribed in the Quran for those reached by the guidance of this Book.

- the second condition is Doing good, meaning at least in accordance with the innate guidance (for those not reached by the revelations), or as prescribed in the Quran for those reached by the guidance of this Book. That is why in the Quran exhortation to perform good deeds is preceded everywhere by Faith and the prophets themselves are not exempted from such principle 6:88. It is thus not any deed, but the best of deeds that is required 67:2, meaning for those reached by divine revelation, with deep sincerity and faith 
9:19,53-4"Spend willingly or unwillingly, it shall never be accepted from you; (for) verily you have ever been an ungodly people. And naught prevented that their spendings should be accepted from them, save that they have disbelieved in Allah and in his Messenger, and they do not perform the prayer but while they are sluggish, and they do not spend but while they are averse". 
The best of deeds is one which is done because it conforms with the fabric of the universe, as commanded by the Creator of all things, not solely because it feels like it is the right thing to do at a particular time. That mindframe is restricted, and selfish even if it seems to bring good in a specific situation. The best of deeds however is a mindframe that changes one's perception of humanity's role in all aspects of life, making the individual an active participant in an intricate mechanism whose ultimate purpose is goodness, regardless of one's whims, personal feelings and appreciations.

The willful rejecters of Islam, can still do good and be rewarded in this world, but their deeds will have no value in the Hereafter if it turns out to be the same Hereafter that was described in the Book they rejected entirely after having properly understood it 
5:27"Allah only accepts from the God-conscious".

40:40"and whoever does good, whether male or female, and he is a believer, these shall enter the garden, in which they shall be given sustenance without measure" 

Heaven can be likened to a relationship with God, just as Hell is the absence of such connection 
13:20-25"Those who fulfill the covenant of Allah and do not break the contract, And those who join that which Allah has ordered to be joined and fear their Lord and are afraid of the evil of [their] account, And those who are patient, seeking the countenance of their Lord, and establish prayer and spend from what We have provided for them secretly and publicly and prevent evil with good - those will have the good consequence of [this] home - Gardens of perpetual residence; they will enter them with whoever were righteous among their fathers, their spouses and their descendants. And the angels will enter upon them from every gate, [saying], "Peace be upon you for what you patiently endured. And excellent is the final home." But those who break the covenant of Allah after contracting it and sever that which Allah has ordered to be joined and spread corruption on earth - for them is the curse, and they will have the worst home".
Each person's corresponding share in it is directly related to the amount and measure of connection that was created and developed in this life. This is the reason for God creating this world imperfect. It is up to the humans to perfect it by making use of it God-consciously and progressively building a relation with the Creator. Had God made a perfect world and beamed us down to enjoy it, He wouldnt be more than parasites. By leaving some things incomplete and instructing us to fill them in, He promotes us to a full partnership in His creative work. People who did not develop a relationship or developed one with something else, they have no share in this afterlife for they had no intention of meriting Allah's approbation in their deeds and expected no compensation in the Hereafter. 

The concept of nearness to Allah implies honoring, satisfaction and reward as often stated in the Quran. It is used in different contexts, as in the magicians whom Pharaoh promised to honor by drawing them near to him 26:42, to the believers who are urged to seek the means to obtain Allah's nearness 5:35. Nearness to Allah in the Hereafter is presented as the foremost reward of the foremost in faith, far surpassing everything that heaven may offer of delights 56:10-11,88,54:55,83:28 the Prophet Jesus is likewise made near to Allah 3:45, as the angels near to Allah executing His commands 4:172. Those honored individuals will experience realities of the unseen that are restricted to others 83:21. Further, those nearest to God 
21:19"are never too proud to worship Him and never grow weary". 
Contrary to worldly ownership and mastership, the closer a servant is to his master the more benefits he gains in terms of power, material gains and personal freedom. But as regards to God's ownership which is the true and absolute one, the closer the servant is drawn to Him the more humbled and submissive the servant becomes, aware of his insignificance in relation to the Supreme Being. That is how complete and intricate the Quran is, in its argumentations for perfect monotheism.
 
In contrast, Hell is described as the place of those whom Allah has "laan". Often rendered "curse", the Arabic denotes remoteness from God 3:87. Hell is the necessary result of separation from God. God is the source of all goodness, separation from Him necessarily results in a situation devoid of all goodness. And Hell is the climax of the absence of all good. The punishment of the disbelievers the day they are raised is described as the alienation from God's mercy 
23:66,83:15,20:126,11:99"And they are overtaken by curse/laana in this (world), and on the resurrection day, evil the gift which shall be given". 
All those who attribute a lie to Allah incur His curse/laanat (distancing or being forsaken) 11:18, as well as those who die as disbelievers 2:161, those who commit great sins like murder 4:93, hypocrites 9:68, ungratefulness 15:17 or slander 24:23. 

To further corroborate how rejecting God from one's life in this world manifests as severing of ties in the hereafter. The Quran explains that In the hereafter, all Revelations will be fulfilled. The veil over the unseen realities will be lifted, and truth will be so evident that not a single soul will deny the Creator. Those that did so in this life will ask to be sent back to behave differently, or will beg for the dreadful cataclysms of the day of resurrection to be delayed 6:27-28,7:53,32:12,39:56-9,44:10-16. But these requests will be denied, universal judgement must eventually happen at a time most appropriate as decreed by the perfect Judge. There is no postponing of a time of respite during which sufficient exposure to the clear warnings has occurred 35:37. Further, even if the requested is granted 
"if they were sent back, they would certainly go back to that which they are forbidden, and most surely they are liars". 
The condemned will acknowledge that reality as they have now gained understanding of the functioning of spiritual causality, stating that although they are eager to return to life to make amends and take advantage of every occasion to do good, they themselves arent sure whether this desire will actualize. This is indicated with laAAla in 23:100. That is why some people, even if they are made to live indefinitely, they will remain in the same spiritual condition of denial and ungratefulness 2:96. 

The request to return will thus be denied, just as will be their declaration of faith, and they will still be labelled disbelievers 46:34. The hereafter is the place where the spiritual condition manifests to such an extent that it affects the resurrected body, incapable of bending the knees and prostrating in worship when commanded. This will ironically mirror their willfull refusal to worship in this world 68:42-3,77:48-9. It follows that their demands for forgiveness, which stem from the repentant heart of the worshipper, will be cut short and forbidden from further pleas 41:24,30:57. As Solomon is reported to have stated in regards to prayers offered to God after the time of respite expires 
Prov1:28"Then they will call me, and I will not answer; they shall seek me, and they shall not find me".
Their knees will only bend when that physical desire will be unrelated to worship, but to abasement, begging to be spared entry in hell 19:72. There is a similar statement in the Hebrew Bible concerning the non-validity of worship in the hereafter 
Ps115:17"Neither will the dead praise God, nor all those who descend to the grave". 
Hezekiah's prayer in Isa38 strongly reflects that notion too.

Their state of certainty, which will only be due to profound regret at seeing the undeniable manifestation of the realities they were warned about 6:28,10:54,67:8-11 and which they suppressed all the while entertaining the idea that it might possibly be true, cannot benefit them anymore 
16:84,32:29,89:23"On that day shall man be mindful, and what shall being mindful (then) avail him?".
 Spiritual mindfulness is irrelevant beyond this world 
34:52"And how shall the attaining (of faith) be possible to them from a distant place".  
In this world where mankind is given the opportunity to reject or accept faith, God indiscriminately provides among the humans, as a matter of testing their God-consciousness, not to honor them 39:52,34:35,17:20. This higher objective is captured through the recurrent statement "that you might be grateful" ending the verses speaking of God's favors. Through this device (wealth, power, children, health etc) we have opportunities to feel God's presence whichever way we look 2:115. That is why the lawful things must be opened to all, and no human being has the authority to withhold them from another. No man-made laws are allowed to overrule this divine plan 2:168 especially not when it comes to the believers themselves 2:172. They are the foremost entitled to enjoy God's bounties, as they profit from them with gratefulness and God-consciousness in this world. That is why God states that despite this indiscriminate distribution among the people, the bounties as well as the inheritance of the land are for the believers in this world and will be exclusively theirs in the Hereafter 
21:105,39:73-4,43:72,7:32"Who has prohibited the embellishment of Allah which He has brought forth for His servants and the good provisions? Say: These are for the believers in the life of this world, purely (theirs) on the resurrection day" 
7:50"And the inmates of the fire shall call out to the dwellers of the garden, saying: Pour on us some water or of that which Allah has given you. They shall say: Surely Allah has prohibited them both to the unbelievers". 
Those who rejected God's mercy in this world will be forbidden from it in the hereafter. It will only be made available to those who proved themselves worthy of it, ie "purely (theirs) on the resurrection day". As regards to the others, as they were completely "off the mark" conjecturing on the Unseen, they will be raised far away from God's grace and mercy 
34:52-53"And how shall the attaining (of faith) be possible to them from a distant place? And they disbelieved in it before, and they utter conjectures with regard to the unseen from a distant place". 
The disbelievers being located in a "distant" place, ie in regards to the straight path is repeatedly alluded to for example in 6:71,41:44,53. The prophet Micah alludes to the same phenomenon in this very world, the day the promised punishment befalls the transgressors 
Micah3:4"then they shall cry out to the Lord, but He shall not respond to them; and He shall hide His countenance from them at that time, as they wrought evil with their works". 
Again in Prov15:29 it says that 
"The Lord is far from the wicked".
Their own spiritual senses will testify to this heedlessness on the Resurrection 41:19-23. They will realize the error of neglecting those senses to the point they became unreceptive 67:10-11. Their spiritual state in this world (blindness, deafness) will be a source of suffering in the hereafter, taking them even further in their misguidance away from the path of truth 
17:97,20:124-7,21:100,17:72"And whoever is blind in this, he shall (also) be blind in the hereafter, and more erring from the way". 
This shows that man's spiritual state in life is amplified in the Hereafter and the spiritual degradation will cause them not to sense or experience anything of God's mercy 
23:66,83:15,20:126"Our communications came to you but you neglected them; even thus shall you be forsaken this day".
 Just as our physical form in this world depends on proper fetal development, our re-creation in the hereafter will depend on our spiritual development in this world. A person born in this world with physical disabilities will be hindered in experiencing the pleasures of this world, and will sometimes live a life of suffering. The same happens to the spiritually disabled in the hereafter. They end up forsaken for their ungratefulness in this world 16:83 on a Day whose occurrence they rejected and neglected 
45:31-4"Today We forsake you as you neglected the meeting of this day of yours". 
God forsakes them in fact in this very world, when they waste their time of respite 25:18, neglecting the guidance that should have instead triggered their inner disposition to believe 
64:6,30:30,21:10"Certainly We have revealed to you a Book in which is your good remembrance". 
God will be veiled from them, they will not see His mercy 83:15 while the believers on the other hand because of having developed and nurtured their spirituality will feel and experience God's mercy with such intensity that they will literally be "in" Allah's mercy 3:107.

This "cutting off" of the rejecters and blind transgressors is something David speaks of in his 
Psalms73:27"For behold, those who have distanced themselves from You will perish; You have cut off anyone who strays from You".
When the Quran speaks of the people's final destination in the Hereafter, it adjoins "righteousness" to "faith" as a prerequisite for entering Heaven 20:75,64:9 while no mention has been made of the "evil acts" of the future dwellers of Hell, only their "disbelief". This subtely indicates that disbelief by itself is enough to determine a person's situation in the hereafter, whether that disbelief is accompanied by the evil act or not 30:15-16.

A believer is one who has cleft the limits of the visible world of 'materiality' by accepting the existence of another one perceivable only through reasonable and spiritual deduction. By doing so, he has created a connection between himself and the realm of an extraordinary, bigger, and greater world.

Plato's "Euthyphro Dilemma", often invoked by atheists, in which Socrates asks Euthyphro: 
“Is a pious man loved by the gods because he is pious, or is he considered pious because he is loved by the gods?” 
should thus be re-stated in Islamic, or generally speaking monotheistic terms; 
“Is what is ‘good’ commanded by God because it is good, or is it considered ‘good’ because God commands it?”. 
As already answered above, one who does a morally commendable action simply because it agrees with his conscience or intellect while knowingly rejecting the divine authority that commanded that action will not be successful in a world -the afterlife- designed for those who developed a relationship with God. That type of deed does not qualify as the "best of deeds", which is what God demands of us 67:2. 

This defines "good" or anything ultimately ethical as "what God wants". This is because God wants us to do what is good and avoid what is bad for us and for the community at large in this world and in the next world. What God wants is what is good and God wants it because it is good.  As a side note, from a philosophical viewpoint, it is humanly impossible to perform a purely, ethically altruistic action because of the very existence of a motivation for the altruistic act. It is the difference between mercy/generosity coming from God, of which He has nothing to gain and human generosity. The person helping concludes that his/her help will make someone better off than before. And it is this knowledge which makes absolute selflessness impossible, because this knowledge is in itself a utility gain to the helper. The gain may be a concrete sense of goodwill, or just the simple knowledge that they have helped someone. Therefore, all acts of generosity have some degree of self-interest attached to them. A believer in God, in addition to the satisfaction of knowing that a fellow human is in better condition, has fulfilled an act that does not stem from fleeting whims and feelings. He has fulfilled a duty, regardless of his personal judgement, one that is more far-reaching in that it conforms with the overall system of the universe.

Those who rejected the belief in God and the Hereafter when guidance clearly came to them, their deeds, which they confined to this world and for the achievement of their worldly desires, without any expectation of repercussions in the Hereafter, will therefore have no weight ie worthless in the world to come 
7:147,47:1"(As for) those who disbelieve and turn away from Allah's way, He shall render their works ineffective". 
The standard against which the deeds are weighted, as already said, is the truth. Truth is a combination of the correct deeds with correct faith. These incomplete works will thus ultimately vanish like ashes scattered by the winds of a "stormy" Day, ie the Day of Resurrection where Truth makes all falsehood vanish 
14:18,24:39-40,25:23,47:1-3,18:105"Therefore their works are vain, and on the Day of Resurrection We assign no weight to them". 
In reference to the same reality, the book of Psalms states 
Ps1:4-6"Not so the wicked, but [they are] like chaff that the wind drives away. Therefore, the wicked shall not stand up in judgment, nor shall the sinners in the congregation of the righteous. For the Lord knows the way of the righteous, but the way of the wicked shall perish". 
Again, we read in 
Prov11:18"A wicked man earns illusory wages". 
Judaism in addition states that because the Torah (binding on Jews) and noachide laws (binding on non-Jews) are meant to develop a relationship with God, then should a person comply by any of those commands like not stealing, without that his compliance be rooted in the desire to please God then the person still doesnt get any reward in the hereafter, a world in the presence of God for whom the person didnt actually do anything. The opposite is the case of the one who refrains from stealing because he believes it is a law binding on himself and revealed to Moses.

This is a major Quranic theme. When all has been created with an inner truth, for a higher purpose and for an appointed term in a universe whose phenomena all testify to a higher reality 30:8,14:19,10:3-6 by Allah who is Truth in essence 22:6,62 it necessitates that everything false or based on falsehood, ie devoid of its higher purpose ultimately perishes. That reality many times manifested in this very world with the uprooting of transgressing nations altogether. That is why, as said previously, only the Truth in one's actions will be measured 
7:8"The weighing on that day is the true. As for those whose scales are heavy, they are the successful".
Their deeds are therefore nullified in the Hereafter, and their good deeds, that is, those deeds in accordance with their "self-reproaching soul" and innate understanding of good and evil will be restrained to this passing world 
18:104"lost in this world's life"
 as if they were lush vegetations that then become 
18:45"dry broken into pieces which the winds scatter". 
The restriction of these deeds to this passing world means they will have no value in the Hereafter because they were not done with the right perspective of building a relationship with God. Their corresponding reward will be paid in this world, because the Quran repeatedly says that Allah never lets the good deeds remain unrewarded 
42:20,46:20,17:18,11:15-16"Whoever desires this world's life and its finery, We will pay them in full their deeds therein, and they shall not be made to suffer loss in respect of them. These are they for whom there is nothing but fire in the hereafter, and what they wrought in it shall go for nothing, and vain is what they do". 
This general statement covers all people, regardless of their belief or profession of faith, including Muslims who also may sometimes transgress and conduct themselves hypocritically or with a strict materialistic mindframe. Certain crimes and great sins however warrant a punishment so severe that the nullification of the reward does not only concern the next life, but also the present one 2:217,3:21-2.

As regards the previously mentioned notion of restraining the reward of certain good deeds to this present life only, the New Testament speaks of the same principle, when it quotes Jesus in Matt6 about those who do "good" without any perspective of the Hereafter such as praying, fasting or giving to charity only to be seen by men that they will have no reward in the Hereafter and that they will be paid in full in this world only, meaning the deed will not be considered as "good" in the Hereafter 
"Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full" 
or as stated in the Quran 
4:142,107:4-6"So woe to the praying ones, Who are unmindful of their prayers, Who do (good) to be seen". 
Those who die while still guilty of shirk with God/attributing equal or superior authority to anything besides God will suffer the same fate 
39:65"And certainly, it has been revealed to you and to those before you: Surely if you associate (with Allah), your work would certainly come to naught and you would certainly be of the losers". 
Shirk is the major roadblock to mankind's spiritual purpose. Although God could forcefully make one achieve that goal of creation, by for instance erasing all reasons for the spiritual dissensions among the humans 42:8, He has decreed in accordance with divine justice, moral accountability, and the overarching principle of no compulsion in religion 2:256,18:29 that we must maintain and nurture our own inner selves through tazkiya 87:14,91:7-10. The word stems from z-k-w, used concretely for a plant that matures well and bears fruit. It is metaphorically used for all religious directives, particularly charity/zakat, as they help one to grow spiritually and bear fruit in the hereafter. Tazkiya is a process ultimately beneficial for one'self 35:18, manifesting itself in the above spoken notion of servitude to God. 

There is a reason the Quran constantly lays stress on God's transcendental oneness and uniqueness; the acceptance of that concept frees man from all sense of dependence on other influences and powers, and thus elevates him spiritually and brings about that tazkiya/purification, for Allah alone is the way to achieve that goal 4:49. Because shirk with God/ascribing an equal or superior authority to anything besides Him, compromises that objective, the Quran describes it as the only unforgivable sin if left unrepented for until the signs of death, anything other than that may or may not be forgiven by God if left unrepented for, according to God's knowledge, justice, mercy  4:48,116,25:68-71,39:53-55. 

It is to be kept in mind that just as there are intrinsic rights in creation depending on rank, for example the rights of an insect arent as those of a sentient animal, nor of a human, nor king, similarly God epitomizes maximal rights, honour and authority vis a vis the humans. Denying His supremacy is thus the maximal transgression of a human in relation to Him. Hence the categorization of this sin as the highest in severity.

Other sins, if left unrepented for, lead to the same consequences, such as hypocrisy, blind denial of the truth and pursuit of falsehood, aversion to the divine guidance, death after having apostised, unjustified murder of the righteous 2:217,3:21-2,5:52-3,18:105,47:1-9. However the most extreme case of loss is the one, regardless of his level of righteousness, that falls into a type of sin that renders all previous upright deeds devoid of any value in the Hereafter. Among high profiles of righteousness having instantly lost themselves to a great sin the traditions speak of Iblis, and the Quran, after providing a list of honorable prophets states that 
6:88"and if they had set up others (with Him), certainly what they did would have become ineffectual for them". 
The HB similarly states the good deeds of the righteous are all erased if he should fall into idolatry and persistently commit the great sins without repenting, thinking that his past righteousness will save him Ezek18:24,33:13. As observed by the prophet Solomon righteousness can quickly be outweighed by even a single sin 
Ecc10:1"Fying flies make putrid and foamy the oil of a perfumer; so does a little folly outweigh wisdom and honor". 
In parallel to the circumstances leading to the nullification of the good deeds, the Quran also says that when a person's actions satisfy all criteria of acceptability, then it is the evil deeds that are nullified 11:114,29:7. This rewarding, cleansing process occurs in the Hereafter prior to the successful's entry into Heaven, a place of perfect purity, as gracious gift from God.

In the case of those who rejected or disregarded most or all of the directives of the Quran when it was communicated to them (Muslims and non-Muslims alike) and who transgressed willingly and rebelliously, then despite their good actions, their measurements will be light 
23:102-103"Then as for him whose scales/mawazin are heavy, these are the successful. And as for him whose scales are light, these are they who shall have lost their souls, abiding in hell". 
The Quran also clearly says that among the Muslims themselves there are different grades in God's eyes 35:32-5 and although all will eventually enter heaven, this entry will be granted differently from person to person following a personalized appropriate trial, going from short and easy to lengthy and difficult. 

Some will even have to pass through Hell as long as Allah deems fit before being granted entry in heaven 6:128,11:106-108 and the Quran has mentioned several crimes such as murder, corruption of inheritance, abusing the weak people's wealth or charity etc whose perpetrators will go to hell regardless of their faith. It is in such context that the following prophetic saying is understood 
"Gabriel, upon him be peace, came to me with the good news that anyone from my nation who dies without associating partners with Allah will enter Paradise. I said, “Even if he commits adultery and theft?” The Prophet said: Even if he commits adultery and theft". 
Elsewhere 
"People among those who worshiped Allah alone (ahl al-tawḥīd) will be punished in the Hellfire until they are coals. Then the mercy of Allah will reach them and they will be taken out and presented at the gates of Paradise. The people of Paradise will pour water over them and they will grow just as the stubble carried by the stream grows, then they will enter Paradise". 
These Mawazin/scales of the day of judgement, is in the plural because it isnt the concept of a regular scale that is meant here. The plural indicates that there will be many criteria of evaluation and measurements to which the deeds will be compared, meaning that the good nature of the deed itself is not enough for it to be weighty in the spiritual realm. 

In fact -as explained in details above- a good deed, even done by someone who has professed Islam, such as prayers, fasts, zakat and others can be rendered null and void in the Hereafter if not done as prescribed by God, Who does not judge actions and deeds according to their external form but on the basis of the faith and sincerity underlying them 
2:264,3:117,13:22,33:19,67:2"He is the Lord who created death and life so that He may test you that which of you is better in deed". 
The ultimate reality of creation is to be a test in the performance of good deeds rather than the quantity of such deeds. For instance when concluding the passage ordaining fasting upon those claiming to adhere to correct faith, it states 
2:185"and exalt Allah for His having guided you, and that perhaps you might be grateful (to Him)".
 The bestowal of guidance upon a fasting believer is a conclusive reality however sincerity in obedience is conditional upon the person's level of God-consciousness, hence the term "perhaps" attached to the deeper appreciation of the practice.

In many ways does the Quran explain the fact that quantity isnt what is asked from us but rather quality of deeds, including through subtle and eloquent linguistic devices. In 20:75 for example the adjective alsalihat/the good, refers to the deeds, which is rhetorically omitted to bring more focus on the adjective, in this case quality/goodness. Then the verse proceeds to negate quantity and focus on quality, from another angle. The adjective salihat should normally be in the singular feminine, to indicate plural yet the plural feminine is used. This abnormal construction was used even in preislamic literature to indicate that a lesser plural in terms of quantity is meant. Once more, the normal grammatical rule is that a singular feminine adjective comes with an object (the deeds in this particular case) to indicate quantity but if the adjective is in the plural feminine it implies a lesser quantity. 

Then again towards the verse's end, the adjective alulaa/the high, describing the ranks of the successful in the Hereafter, follows the same abnormal grammatical construction in order to indicate a lesser plural. This implies that the high dwelling places are restricted, few, exclusive, yet even so, in order to achieve these exalted places one doesn't need to exert himself quantitatively but qualitatively as indicated in the first part of the verse. 

That concept is exemplified in the previous verses, through the account of Pharaoh's magicians who, towards their life's end, came to believe and remain steadfast in their faith despite the promised torture. Elsewhere when it adjoins the salihat to correct faith as a prerequisite for success in the Hereafter, it precedes the word with min/of to indicate that complete accomplishment of all righteous deeds is not the intent, even acting upon a part of the prescribed deeds is enough to be counted among the successful 21:94 and God will never let go to waste even the tiniest of those deeds, done in the most secret of ways 99:7. It is reported that 
"by his good character a man can reach the degree of the one who stands in prayer at night and the one who is thirsty from fasting in the heat of the day".
And as a matter of fact, quality inevitably leads to quantity, eagerness to re-live a spiritually fulfilling experience. Following with the same idea of quality over quantity in terms of deeds is the very general and unspecific injunction to do, side by side with the performance of prayer and charity, any type of good 2:110.  The overall principle in Islam in relations to reward in the afterlife is that nothing we can do in itself merits the disproportionate good that lies in store. Only by God's grace are the righteous believers rewarded with paradise. Thus the Quran and the traditions emphasize moderation in religion, as well as the quality, sincerity and constancy in doing good deeds 
"The Prophet was asked, "What deeds are loved most by Allah?" He said, "The most regular constant deeds even though they may be few." He added, 'Don't take upon yourselves, except the deeds which are within your ability".

   "The Prophet said, "Do good deeds properly, sincerely and moderately, and receive good news because one's good deeds will not make him enter Paradise." They asked, "Even you, O Allah's Messenger?" He said, "Even I, unless and until Allah bestows His pardon and Mercy on me".

The balance, just like the books of deeds, the witnessing entities that will be brought forth whether external or within our own selves, are only tools serving the purpose of articulating the truth of one's deeds in such a way that it will inevitably lead to self conviction. They are some of the aspects of God's perfect court of justice 
5:109,4:166,6:19,10:28-29,17:13-14,21:47"And We will set up a just balance on the day of resurrection, so no soul shall be dealt with unjustly in the least; and though there be the weight of a grain of mustard seed, (yet) will We bring it, and sufficient are We to take account" 25:58"and Sufficient is He as being aware of the faults of His servants".
This new world, besides obeying to different natural laws, will obey to a different system that shall define success in it. Its "currency" -as explained in details above- will be the good deeds done in the former life, and carried to the next life by correct faith, hence the necessity to keep both worlds in view 
2:200-201"For, of men there is he who says, "Our Lord! give us in this world", and for him there shall be no portion in the Hereafter. And among them there is he who says, Our Lord! give us good in this world and good in the Hereafter and save us from the chastisement of the Fire". They shall have (their) portion of what they have earned; and Allah is quick in reckoning". 
This passage conveys the important message that a person should be aware that what is good in this world is dependent on the fact that it should become a means of our success in the Hereafter, and only the Almighty can have such knowledge 
2:216"and it may be that you dislike a thing while it is good for you, and it may be that you love a thing while it is evil for you, and Allah knows, while you do not know". 
Hence, it is best for a person to leave this matter to the Almighty and not present his own suggestion in this regard. A person who only seeks the vainglories of this world without caring for his faith in the Hereafter will have no portion of good in it, his deeds shall be void and forfeited 
46:20"And on the day when those who disbelieve shall be brought before the fire: You did away with your good things in your life of the world and you took your fill of pleasure in them.." 21:47,18:105"so their deeds become void and We will not assign to them any weight on the Day of Resurrection". 
The Quran says that one builds his place in the hereafter, whether in paradise or hell through his current deeds. He is consequently said as being made to "inherit" that place in the next life. If one doesnt believe in the next life, then his works will remain in this current life of which he will have his proper share. It is faith that makes the good works of this life to be fruitful in the next, without faith the good deeds of this life cannot be fruitful in the next in the case of the willful disbeliever.

Because nothing on that Day will be of value in the eyes of God other than one's deeds carried in the Hereafter with correct faith, those who do not qualify will wish by all means to buy themselves out but on this day of Truth neither will friendships avail people nor any sale/purchase, or ransom will be of any use to anyone 2:254,5:36,16:96,26:88,44:41. 

In the utopian Biblical Messianic era, a time whose descriptions parallels in most aspects the Quranic day of judgement, the Psalmist speaks of 
Ps49:7-10"Those who rely on their possessions and boast of their great wealth, no one can redeem the life of another or give to God a ransom for them. The redemption of their soul will be too dear, and unattainable forever. Will he live yet forever and not see the Pit?"


Sam Shamoun "Muhammad’s Family In Hell: How Allah Dishonored his “Prophet”" (4)


In the Quran gratitude towards parents, that is described as one of the best human deeds 46:15 because of them being instrumental in one's coming to life, is linked to man's gratitude towards God 31:14,17:23-24 who is the ultimate cause and source of all existence. 

They must be honored and shown humility as likewise stated in the HB in Prov23:22. They must in addition be included in one's prayers even after their passing away 
"My Lord, have compassion on them, as they brought me up (when I was) little". 
This is a religious etiquette that benefits the person and society at large, by cementing the principle of goodness and honoring towards one's parents, event if they are not necessarily deserving of God's mercy. 

As well, they are to be assisted throughout their life and in their old days as a token of appreciation, without ever showing them disdain 
17:25"Your Lord knows best what is in your minds, if you are good then He is surely Forgiving to those who turn to Him frequently". 
The Quran integrates that pragmatic observation within the passage because it may be that a person impulsively says or does something hurtful to his parents. So long as one's core and habit is goodness and piety, then God may forgive such an unintented outburst. It is worthwhile noting that the verse eloquently omits to explicitly mention such a behavior, indicating that it isnt even befitting to speak of it, much less perform it. Together with the rest of the close family, a believer must pay special attention to their spirituality, reminding them of the prayers and the necessity of steadfastness on the straight path 20:132. 

They must be obeyed, not according to their own standards, but according to God's whose limits are that they or any other relatives should not associate others with Allah or incite into sin. Even in such cases however the Quran speaks of the believers' duty to deal with love, kindness and forgiveness with the closest family members, even if they reject Islam in peace, without actively contending and opposing the religion. While dealing kindly with them, the believers must remain firm in their religion 29:8,31:14-15,64:14.

However as logically stated in 58:22, none can be a true believer while at the same time having a close affectionnate and friendly relation with anyone actively fighting God's cause. As David says in his Psalms
Psalms119:104-5,139:21-22"From Your precepts I shall gain understanding; therefore, I hate all ways of falsehood. Your words are a lamp for my foot, and light for my path...Did I not hate Your enemies, O Lord? With those who rise up against You, I quarrel. I hate them with utmost hatred; they have become my enemies". 
Aversion towards everything false and sinful as well as severing of ties with all sources of wickedness is the natural outcome of the acceptance of the straight path and pursuit of the Truth. The prophets of the HB often repeated that reality, as well as Jesus in the NT Matt10:34-7,15:4-6,19:17-19. Family bonds, though sacred, can never take precedence over God's requirements. And when the case is such concerning the most sacred of human bonds, then how much more is it true when it comes to other relations and wordly interests towards which people hypocritically become conciliating 
33:1-4"O Prophet! be careful of (your duty to) Allah and do not comply with (the wishes of) the unbelievers and the hypocrites; surely Allah is Knowing, Wise. And follow what is revealed to you from your Lord; surely Allah is Aware of what you do; And rely on Allah; and Allah is sufficient for a Protector. Allah has not made for any man two hearts within him". 
As is often the case, the Quranic style of admonishing the prophet by stressing the importance of his moral duties and the consequences of a potential failure in their performance, is an indirect address to the believers. It increases their awareness, seeing that even the most saintly figure among them isnt above God's spiritual and moral commandments.

As to the wording in 58:22, it says HADD. The words implies active opposition (see 9:63) and the context is that of those who use all means against God's cause. And WADD which is rendered "love" isnt simple love but also carries the meaning of close relationship, affection and friendly support as clear from the context starting at verse 14. What is also interesting to note is that, in comparison to muhib (from hubb/love, more on the level of "liking") which is also used for Allah, wadd is a form of intense, passionate love. It is used in contexts of severe oppression, as in 85:14. It is in these harsh circumstances that a believer begins seeking and pleading for God's consideration, and thus the word is used to describe the intensity of His love and affection for those who undergo severe trials in His ways. In the Quran one reads time and again that Divine approbation does not necessarily manifest in ease, ampleness or material comforts. Both hardships and ease are trials meant at improving and testing one's spiritual resolve, and none of them occur except by God's will and knowledge 89:15-20.

In line with the upright attitude to be adopted with one's parents, Ibrahim during his mission, prayed for God to forgive his disbelieving father, who was among those that denied his message 26:69-86, like Nuh did before him for his disbelieving son. Ibrahim's dad in addition physically threatened his son, and Ibrahim's forbearance, all the while sharply dissociating himself spiritually, in regards to him is an example for every believer to contemplate. The Quran in 31:33 alludes to that idea, through a subtle linguistic device once more testifying to its unmatched eloquence. When speaking of the impossibility for father and child to bear one another's burden on the day of resurrection, it uses jaza in the future tense for the father while it is in the form of a noun for the child. This indicates permanence and repetition, in allusion to the child's duty in this life of repeatedly dealing with humility and forbearance with the parents. This also points to the hard reality that although it could and should be the case in this world, it is a state that will not perdure in the hereafter where eachone carries his own burdens.
Ibrahim in addition pledged to his disbelieving father that had just sent him away from the household on account of his incessant preaching 
19:46-8"Peace be on you, I will pray to my Lord to forgive you; surely He is ever Affectionate to me..maybe i will not be disappointed from my prayers to my Sustainer". 
In the meantime the wickedness of his nation had surpassed all limits and culminated with the attempted execution of Ibrahim in a furnace. Obviously, a small load of wood would have been enough to burn a single man however they decided to build a huge fire to quench their revenge, exposing how sunk they were in their attachement to their idols and how deeply affected they were by Ibrahim's actions and words against their religion. Their time of respite had thus arrived and they were about to meet the same fate as the nations of old that not only rejected but tried killing their prophet 9:70,21:70,37:98. 

As they were about to migrate, Ibrahim and the righteous severed all ties with the disbelieving people left behind. Ibrahim however put a limit to the extent of this severing of ties. He had given his word to his father, prior to it becoming clear that he would never mend his ways, that he would pray for his forgiveness and so he abided by his pledge 60:4,9:114. This second pledge that came at a time where the faith of the nation and that of Ibrahim's father became clear, contained a fatalistic element, contrary to the first one 
"I would certainly ask forgiveness for you, and I do not control for you aught from Allah". 
Ibrahim would therefore complete his pledge in order not to have failed a promise made to his father, all the while knowing, as reflected in his re-formulation of the pledge, that God dislikes and does not accede to prayers made on behalf of those who knowingly remain in their spiritual deviations after clear and repeated admonitions 9:80,63:6. This has always been the way of God, as taught to Muhammad and all prophets, for instance Jeremiah is told in the Hebrew Bible concerning the same kind of disbelievers 
Jer7:16"And you, pray not on behalf of this people, neither lift up cry nor prayer, and entreat Me not for I will not hear you" Jer14:11"And the Lord said to me; Do not pray for this people for good". 

God forbids prayers to those who obdurately take their idolatry with them to their grave 9:84,113. 

Ibrahim thus fulfilled his promise after his migration. He prayed for the forgiveness of both his parents 14:41. This establishes the important principle that should a situation occur where the enmity of a kinsfolk toward one's faith becomes so severe, as was the case with Ibrahim, or the early Muslims 60:1-3, one should severe all ties with them indiscriminately. One cannot, after that point pray for their forgiveness as Ibrahim did. Ibrahim only did so because he wanted to honour a pledge he had made when his father's opposition to the religion had not become as severe as when he later joined other idolaters in their enmity. Ibrahim would not had prayed for his father if he hadnt already given his word prior.  

Similarly the prophet Muhammad is told to warn his nearest relations and distance himself from them should they persist in their misdeeds 26:213-216. Likewise the prophet Nuh was commanded to turn away from the son he loved due to his active disbelief up to his last breath 11:45-7, Lut was told to leave his wife behind in the town about to be destroyed on account of her persistent transgressions and rejection. Jesus in the NT told his followers to equally dissociate from the closest family members who would persist in, and call to disbelief. As the prophet Micah stated
 Micah7:5-6"Believe not a friend; trust not a prince; from her who lies in your bosom guard the openings of your mouth. Believe not a friend; trust not a prince; from her who lies in your bosom guard the openings of your mouth".
This illustrates the fact that a close person's piety, be it a father, wife, son, etc does not save one from the consequences of sin and disbelief.

The love and mercy of Allah towards His creatures surpasses, in quantity and quality, the love of both the father and mother put together which is why obeying God must overrule obedience to the parents. When an important duty clashes with a still higher one, the former is to be sacrificed for the latter.
From birth to the last breath everything in the universe depends upon the rububiyat (stemming from Rabb, nourisher, cherisher and sustainer); the nourishing, cherishing, sustaining and protecting aspect of the mercy of the Lord of the worlds 
30:40"Allah is He Who created you, then gave you sustenance, then He causes you to die, then brings you to life"
A day will come where family ties will avail to naught and eachone will have to answer for his own deeds 66:10-11,31:33,35:18. But in all cases, a believer must implicate himself in trying to make them mend their ways 31:15,66:6. This attitude is not only a reflection of gratitude but also evidence of how convinced one can be in his faith to the point he is concerned of his beloved one's faith. In sura Furqan, after speaking of the characteristics of God's true servants, the Quran describes such compassionate believers' prayers 
25:74"And they who say: O our Lord! grant us in our wives and our offspring the joy of our eyes, and make us guides to those who guard (against evil)". 

But again, as already seen in 58:22,64:14 keeping one's faith takes precedence over maintaining one's relation with them if they begin severely opposing the religion. Jesus reflected that notion in Matt10:34,Lk14:26. See also Micah7:6,Matt30:21-36. This is why the Quran states that 
33:6"The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (as) their mothers" 
Those who enjoyn to righteousness, in this case the prophet, provide the right example to follow 
33:21"for him who hopes in Allah and the latter day and remembers Allah much". 

Sam Shamoun "Muhammad’s Family In Hell: How Allah Dishonored his “Prophet”" (3)


Anyone familiar even on a most basic level with the Quran knows that among its most pervasive themes is the fact that to God, the value of a human, regardless of social status, gender, race or kinship only depends on righteousness in deeds and God-consciousness/taqwa 2:221,4:1,135,5:48,25:77,34:37,42:23,49:13.

God does not break ties that were created in this world, but cements them if based on truth and righteousness, everlasting values whose fruitful consequences shall be more evident on the Day of Resurrection. Companionship, including friendship, is one of the blessings of this world and a need of the human being, who is a social creature. It reaches its ultimate in Paradise, meaning one will live amongst friends and those one loves. This is a hopeful outlook on life and love, giving humans a sense of meaning to their earthly relationships which otherwise would be vain in the grand scheme of things.

It is only those bonds that were based upon falsehood and untruth that will dissolve, and the Quran repeatedly alludes to the fact that only the righteous will remain eachother's friends in the Hereafter, not forcefully but willfully dissociating themselves from the unrighteous, no matter who they were in this life 40:18,43:67. We see this phenomenon happening in our own life whenever people come together to commit crimes but are eventually caught and then begin hating and blaming one another when brought to justice. 

The Quran draws the picture of a person in Paradise recounting his 'friendship' with another, and when seeing the latter's state 37:50-7 will be glad that Allah saved him from that. It shows that even those relationships that one holds dear based upon worldly considerations will ultimately be of no value, if it so happened that one of them opposed truth in his life.

The superfluous ties between the people will be cut off to such an extent 2:48 the Quran describes people distancing themselves from their nearest relatives thinking they might have to share some of their burdens in addition to their own 80:34-7. But this severing will be such that even the relatives of the prophets will not be saved from their just fate 66:10. The only ties that will remain and upheld are those of righteousness 43:66. One should therefore firstly try to walk the straight path, and then exhert himself in showing guidance to those under one's responsibility. The prophet Muhammad is warned that he must first preserve himself from deviation in faith, and then call unto his relatives to follow his example 26:213-220. He should warn them that their kinship with him or among themselves will be of no avail in the Hereafter. When a man approached the prophet and asked about his father, who died before the Prophet’s mission, the Prophet said 
“He is in the Fire”. 
To sooth this companion's distress the Prophet did not hesitate to mention his own father 
“Indeed, my father and your father are in the Fire.” 
This was the prophet's nature who always knew how to empathize in the most pragmatic of ways without compromising the creed. Being the mercy to the worlds as stated in the Quran, the prophet was in a position to inadvertently claim special rights from God, especially in relation to his own parents. But he did not, and when he thought of his own mother, instead of asking for her forgiveness, he first asked his Lord if it was appropriate for him to even do so. That is how far removed from self-complacency the prophet was 
"The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) visited the grave of his mother and he wept, and moved others around him to tears, and said: I sought permission from my Lord to beg forgiveness for her but it was not granted to me, and I sought permission to visit her grave and it was granted to me. So visit the graves, for that makes you mindful of death". 
The prophet Nuh's son wasnt forgiven once God's judgement was meted out in this world 11:45-6. With the prophet Shuayb, that reality is eloquently presented. He is mentioned every time as the brother of Madyan, the nation to whom he was sent, but in a single instance in 26:176-7, where every other prophet listed is said to be the the "brother of" their specific nation, the qualification is dropped for Shuayb only. This is because his nation is now identified, not through their Midian/Arab race, but through their religious identity "ashaab al aika/the companions of al aika (the name of a tree they used to worship)". As a side note, the Quran many times creates a consistent pattern of words and expressions, only to break them in highly meaningful contexts.

The awesomeness of such Day, also called the Day of separation 44:40 due to God reducing to naught the value of these ties that were based on falsehood, disbelief and sin, will cause the humans to neglect any inquiry about one another 70:10, and dissociate themselves from one another to avoid being linked to a transgressor or criminal 29:25,39:47,69:35,2:166 giving up their dearest friends and own kinsfolk with whom they wouldnt even entertain the slightest idea of sharing the burden of sins, going as far as wanting to ransom them to save themselves 70:10-14,80:34-7 as each person will only be concerned with the perspective of his own judgement and how to come out successful from it 
23:101,30:14,31:33,35:18,66:10-11,80:37"Every man of them shall on that day have an affair which will occupy him". 
So horrific will be the nature of that day’s torment that emotions of communal support will give place to selfishness towards near ones for which a person has a natural affiliation and a deep bond and sense of defense in this world. It is very pertinent the way in which the Quran pictures that bargaining taking place; with the doomed laying down his most valuable assets immediately in order to buy himself out and get the deal done as soon as possible, his own children, then progressively seeking among his next most important relations, his loved and cherished wife (as denoted with the Arabic saahiba), his brothers and sisters, extended trustworthy family then finally anyone among humanity he would be allowed to use 70:11-14.

That each one will be concerned with his own self on Judgement Day is conveyed with the image of women suckling their infants leaving them unattended, or that of the owner of the she-camel just about to give birth, which represented tremendous importance to the Arabs of the time, becoming unmindful of his most precious possession 
81:4,14:42-3"a day on which the eyes shall be fixedly open, hastening forward, their heads upraised, their eyes not reverting to them and their hearts vacant". 
This day devoid of all hope to those who neglected it 22:55 will cause the people to behave erratically as if intoxicated 22:2 and young children' hair will turn grey at the sight of this general state of fear 73:17.
None will be wronged and 
40:17"every soul shall be rewarded for what it has earned"
 none will be questioned for the deeds of others 34:25-26 and none will want nor be allowed to relieve another from his burden, even if they be as closely related as fathers and sons 
31:33,35:18"And a burdened soul cannot bear the burden of another and if one weighed down by burden should cry for (another to carry) its burden, not aught of it shall be carried, even though he be near of kin". 
The idol-worshippers to who the Quran came, as well as other ancient tribes, believed that the life hereafter was an extension of this one, this is why they buried with them all types of necessities of life sometimes even their concubines and soldiers. But the Quran rejected all such beliefs in no uncertain terms 
6:94"And certainly you have come to Us alone as We created you at first, and you have left behind your backs the things which We gave you, and We do not see with you your intercessors about whom you asserted that they were (Allah's) associates in respect to you; certainly the ties between you are now cut off and what you asserted is gone from you". 
The people, all of them precisely numbered and encompassed by Allah's knowledge 19:93-95 will thus advance for judgement alone, as separate entities 99:6-8 because of the repeated principal of individual, untransferable responsibility of every responsible human being.

Sam Shamoun "Muhammad’s Family In Hell: How Allah Dishonored his “Prophet”" (2)


The Quran protects and upholds Jesus' miraculous conception in a far more truthful, efficient way than is done in the Greek writings.

The Quran consistently uses the matronym "son of Mary" to Jesus. Others in the Bible were referred to with matronyms such as Shamgar son of Anath. This noble matronym isnt a known name in the Christian world, while it is in the Muslim world. This is because the Gospel writers, in their fruitless efforts to trace Jesus back to David, had no interest in Mary's line. A woman's lineage is irrelevant in Jewish law when establishing ancestry. To fulfill the HB's tribal requirements for the messiah, the writers invented 2 (conflicting) genealogies through an adoptive father, Joseph. Jesus in those writings thus became known under a patronym, "son of Joseph". This leaves a whole list of damaging indicators in its trail, undermining the very reason the writers had to result to such falsehood. Not the least being the flaws in both genealogies cancelling any legitimate claim to the throne of the King Messiah (see the Jeconia curse, among other blunders).

The Quranic matronym "son of Mary" carried several deep implications, besides being simply an appellation. In 3:45 the angels give Mary the news that she will soon conceive of a child. This information in itself doesnt indicate anything special, unless it was given to a barren old lady with an equally barren old husband, as in Sara's case who was consequently incredulous at the angelic declaration 11:71-3. Mary would have naturally understood she would conceive in a normal way and there wouldnt have been any reason for her to be surprised at the news 3:47,19:20-1. 

But by adding the information that the future child will be named "son of Mary", among other names, the angels were telling her he would be born without the agency of a father, in a miraculous way. In semitic tradition a person was identified by the father's name so nothing could have been more striking in the psyche of a woman of the time to be told that her son will not be identified by his affiliation to a male, but to a woman.

This miraculous conception is a sign not only Jesus would be known by, but also his mother and the name "son of Mary" implies exactly that; she would jointly share this sign with him forever as both of their names will be mentioned together 
23:50,21:91"and made her and her son a sign for the worlds". 
Jesus as well as his mother were chosen to be made jointly, "A" single sign of the power of the Maker and Creator over all things. So from a Quranic perspective, that miracle equally sets Mary and Jesus apart from humanity. 

Before discussing the implications of this sign, it is worthwhile noting that by honoring Mary in such a way and joining her name to that of one of the most illustrious individuals to have walked the earth, God has defeated in His final revelation and until the resurrection, the slanderous talk of some among her contemporaries and those that followed, who wanted to put a stain on her and abase her.

As regards the sign, it consists in demonstrating how the resurrection of bodies isnt a difficult task to God. We deem it impossible for a female to give life without the necessary biological process yet God did it, so just as He easily creates life in conditions we think are impossible then similarly He is able to bring the dead back to life even if the conditions make it unfeasable from our perspective. The rejection of the concept of resurrection by many Jews of the time adds to the relevancy of that miracle. One can even argue that Jesus was given the greatest evidence for resurrection among God's prophets who all equally stressed the importance of that tenet to their people. This is because Jesus is the only explicit case in the prophetic history where a human's birth did not result from mating. The Quran doesnt even state that Adam was born in such a way, ie that he was not the result of sexual reproduction. 

Other miraculous births are recorded in the Quran, including around the time of Jesus as was the case for the prophet John/Yahya. But they primarily served the purpose of a reward and were not meant to be disclosed and shared openly other than within the circle of the people concerned. Jesus' birth not only was different than all others in its prominence because as already said, intercourse between a man and a woman did not even precede it, but also because it was primarily meant as a sign for all of humanity. As a testimony to this, the Quran uses a linguistic subtlety, showing again and again how it uses words surgically in order to maximize the impact. There is a slight different wording between God's answer to Mary 
3:47"Even so Allah creates what he pleases"
 and to Zakariya 
3:40"Even so does Allah whatsoever He pleases". 
The nuance -creates vs does- lies in that the miracle of a child born of a virgin is definitely more striking than a child born to a couple, even if barren. It must be kept in mind the Quran was recited in the form of speech, publicly and instantly as it came to the prophet, with no chance a re-editing and modifying, and the 2 verses are very closely located. How would one, let alone a known illiterate without any background in poetry or any form of oral eloquent speeches, instantly and naturally make such a distinction in a flowing discourse?
 
The NT writers firstly wanted Jesus to be traced up to King David to fulfill the criteria for the Messiah's lineage. But Jesus had no father as both the Bible and Quran agree, hence the introduction of an adoptive father, Joseph. Now Jesus had to be known under the patronym "son of Joseph" in his community, instead of "son of Mary" as affirmed in the Quran. 

In addition to providing a fabricated lineage, they were now, in their eyes, "protecting" Mary's public image and that of Jesus. She was now engaged before her pregnancy and married when she delivered, not, as the Quran says, completely alone when she met God's messenger, as well as all throughout her pregnancy, including when she secluded herself to deliver the baby. According to the Greek writers, the virgin birth was a secret yet this particular miracle was, according to those same writers that base themselves on the infamous mistranslation of Isa7:14 in the Greek Septuagint, one of the most crucial fulfilments of HB prophecies. This "secret" virgin birth supposedly was among the signs the Israelites had to know from the very beginning to identify the awaited savior 
Isa7:14,Matt1:22"All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: “The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel". 
It is no surprise that in his purported letters, Ignatius the bishop of Antioch and supposed disciple of the apostles declares that Mary's virginity and child bearing were secrets only made known to the world through a "star". 

This is not to mention the cultural ignorance of the non-Jewish Greek writer who penned the story. A Hebrew wedding is celebrated in two parts. In ancient times, the interval between the two ceremonies could take up to several weeks in order to allow time for the new home to be arranged. But to avoid secret encounters between the newly wedds who could not hold their urge to come together, the wedding ie the second ceremony was arranged at the earliest possible opportunity. It is clear from Deut22:23 that a girl described as "betrothed" to a husband already has the status of a legally married woman. This is why a newly-married couple normally consummates their union immediately after their betrothal ceremony to complete it and make it legally valid and binding (Unless there are exceptional reasons why this is impossible as mentioned in the verse, like medical reasons or menstruation). This makes it all the more absurd to paint Mary as "bethroted" prior to her pregnancy. 

The fact is that this non-existent virgin birth prophecy of the HB was inserted into the NT narrative retrospectively. From a theological viewpoint, Christians needed to solve the problem of having the perfect, sinless human sacrifice born of a human mother, while all humans are sinful in nature and that they pass on that depravity to their progeny. They thus neglected and forgot the true purpose of that miracle, and assumed that the object of the virgin birth was to guarantee Jesus would be born without the inevitable sinful stain. Back in these times people didnt know that women contribute just as much if not a bit more (in terms of genetic material) to the formation of a baby than men did. And so by believing that women were a mere passive vessel, in the absence of a human father Jesus would necessarily be free of original sin. The particularities of Yahya/John and Jesus' births, do not make any of them different or special than other human beings in terms of their physical nature. Neither were these miraculous circumstances necessary to accommodate the false notions retrospectively applied to them. For example Jesus did not need to come from a virgin to circumvent human depravity, something Jesus never even spoke of. Neither did Jesus need to combine the immaterial/RUH of Allah, with the material/human mother so as to assume his dual human/divine nature. All humanity has exactly this same dual aspect as Jesus, without any of us being divine.

Jesus had to be known, according to the NT writers themselves, as special since the very beginning, yet not only was the virgin birth obscured to the people through the absurd introduction of a husband but the NT also repeatedly says how the young Jesus was completely unknown in any particular way prior to his ministry in adulthood, see Matt13 for example.

The absurdity doesnt end here, the same NT that tells us his people knew nothing special about him prior to his ministry also tells us of all the wonderful signs and wonders surrounding his first moments as an infant, the celestial signs that prompted both friends and foes to look for him even from outside Palestine, people such as the Magi coming "from the east" to worship the newly born "king of the Jews". Signs of the messiah's impending rise were supposedly so obvious that king Herod, fearing for his throne, began slaughtering all male infants born in Bethleem at that particular time. Mary was prompted to flee with her son to Nazareth to hide and protect him Matt2. 

Part of the NT establishes the fact that it was well known in and outside Palestine that the awaited savior had come, and countless people identified him with Jesus since his youngest days. Elizabeth for instance refers to Mary as "mother of my Lord" as she saw her pregnant Lk1. Shepherds, informed by the angels, rushed to Bethleem to see the newly born messiah. After confirmation 
Lk2:17"they spread the word concerning what had been told them about this child, and all who heard it were amazed at what the shepherds said to them". 
Anna, the daughter of Penuel as well as Simeon recognized in the newly born Jesus the awaited savior and told others about him Lk2. Both rabbis and laymen at the Temple were astonished at the child Jesus' display of wisdom and knowledge. And yet we read elsewhere that nobody knew of the virgin birth miracle, that Jesus was unknown in any special way prior to adulthood. This last incident at the Temple is preceded by the improbable scenario of Jesus' parents travelling from Jerusalem where they had attended Passover, back to their hometown of Nazareth and only noticing after a day's walk that the little Jesus had been left behind. So they return to Jerusalem, and only find him after 3 days search. 

Astoundingly, the NT writers also paint Mary and Joseph, the very ones who witnessed first hand the virgin birth, as completely ignorant of what Jesus meant when he stated that he 
"must be concerned with the affairs of my Father". 
Jesus made that statement in response to Mary's scolding him because of his disappearance Lk2:42-50. Did Mary and Joseph suddenly forget all the miraculous signs and fame surrounding his infancy just 12 years after his birth, as if they had never heard of them and their obvious implications as regards his identity? In another context, Mary, who gave birth to him miraculously, and his brothers James and Jude even thought he had gone mad Mk3.

The Quran, far from copying the above NT absurdities, says the virgin birth was a miracle made known to all. It would be foolish to provide a miracle of virgin birth, while the woman supposed to carry the child is married. For an unmarried woman, in addition known for her piety and chastity, to show up with her own baby would immediately attract the eyes of an entire community upon her, maximizing the impact of the absolving speech of the infant Jesus at once, as vividly and eloquently described in sura Maryam. None would have spontaneously came to her had she been married prior, nobody would have inquired because there would have been no scandal of a woman dedicated to worship in God's temple suddenly showing up with a child. According to the NT depiction, the married Mary now has to prove the virgin birth miracle by going out of her way and pleading repeatedly to the unsuspecting community. It would have been inefficient and debasing. In the Quranic version of the story, the blessed Mary did not need to utter a single word to defend her innocence, preserving her honor and avoiding her the difficulty of having to argue and dispute with a crowd, and neither did the child need to be overexposed so as to repeat his speech senselessly.

The protection of the virgin birth reaches such an extent in the Quran and in such eloquent and intricate details, that whenever Jesus is quoted as addressing the Israelites, he does not once call them "my people" or "my nation" as other Israelite prophets like Moses are quoted as saying in the Quran. Jesus always calls them "Bani Israel" because they, contrary to him, could trace their lineage up to Israel from their fathers, which wasnt his case. Jesus had no worldly father, neither one involved in his conception, nor the made up one of the NT whom the writers needed to create a messianic lineage.

Son of Mary is an appelation used by those that testify to the miraculous circumstances of Jesus' birth, contrary to those calling him by the patronym of the NT. 

While the Quran does agree on certain points with the NT just as it does with the HB in other instances the Quran corrects the errors that have crept into these Books and further adds unknown, obscured or forgotten information. If Muhammad was copying from them, then one has to explain how the very subtle differences, which are loaded with meaning, let alone the major differences are there in the Quran. In fact so respectful of her own chastity and integrity is Maryam portrayed in the Quran, that when an occasion to transgress and fornicate did present itself, the spiritually aware, the highly God conscious Maryam sought protection to God and appealed to the messenger's own sense of self respect in his behavior towards her. This happened when the messenger came to the pious Maryam as she was secluded in the monastery, hidden from view 19:16-19. 

Thats how comprehensively the Quran protects Mary's chastity.

Further reading related to Sam Shamoun's article "Muhammad’s Family In Hell: How Allah Dishonored his “Prophet”"

Sam Shamoun "Muhammad’s Family In Hell: How Allah Dishonored his “Prophet”" (1)


God in His wisdom and all encompassing knowledge, chose individuals and lineages above the nations of the world in terms of divine favors, which includes prophecy 
3:33"Surely Allah chose Adam and Nuh and the descendants of Ibrahim and the descendants of Imran above the nations. Offspring one of the other; and Allah is Hearing, Knowing". 
Adam, who was not the first human being, but rather God's first vicegerent according to the precise words in the Quran, was the one who initiated the line of prophethood among the nations. Adam had several sons, at least two 5:27, and hence after the original prophet it was necessary to specify in which line the following prophet came; it was the line leading to the prophet Nuh. Nuh was survived by an unspecified number of offspring following the deluge 37:75-7 but prophethood or special divine favors did not spread to all of them or all their descendants, it was necessary to specify in which line the following prophet came; it was the line going through his descendant Ibrahim. 

Because prophethood then ramified and spread among Ismail and Isaac, the 2 sons of Ibrahim, the verse speaks of the chosenness of Ibrahim's household and finally, as an introduction to the story of the blessed Mary and her son the prophet Jesus, the verse discerns one of the lines within Ibrahim's household whose descendants were favored; it was the line running through Imran the father of Mary and grandfather of Jesus. The passage in no way point to the superiority of one of the mentionned lines from among Adam's progeny, above another.